Update to OpenBLAS 0.3.18 as dependency for FlexiBLAS 3.0.4 (used in foss/2021.07)

[SebastianAchilles]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[SebastianAchilles]

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
centos8-eb - Linux centos linux 8.3.2011, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz (skylake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/5b9952a3c9c4121c5df9593b57e0e225 for a full test report.

[boegel]

@SebastianAchilles Hmm, that doesn't exactly match with the toolchain versioning scheme anymore, since OpenBLAS 0.3.18 was released Oct 2nd...

[SebastianAchilles]

@SebastianAchilles Hmm, that doesn't exactly match with the toolchain versioning scheme anymore, since OpenBLAS 0.3.18 was released Oct 2nd...

That is true, but the same argument applies for #14164 as libfabric v1.13.1 was released on Aug 25th.

Currently the EasyConfig for OpenBLAS v0.3.17 using GCC 11.2.0 contains a patch which is part of the v0.3.18 release (https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/develop/easybuild/easyconfigs/o/OpenBLAS/OpenBLAS-0.3.17-GCC-11.2.0.eb#L18). That is why I think it makes more sense to use OpenBLAS v0.3.18 in the upcoming foss/2021b toolchain.

[boegel]

@SebastianAchilles For foss/2021b, we should definitely use latest OpenBLAS, yes.

[boegel]

Maybe we should just promote foss/2021.07 in place to foss/2021b for EasyBuild 4.5.0?

If we'll go forward like this, merging this PR is fine imho...

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14167 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14167 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 7119

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 947927486 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node2624.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/86a3d580495edb1432a53dab9eee2cd6 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3511.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e73785778d3890f5900c0400a0b0edcb for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3905.accelgor.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7413 24-Core Processor (zen2), 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM-80GB, 470.57.02, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/ed444a72c516d87f30bb7800905fcefa for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e2ba5354c6d823e82bf4afc7de72ead1 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @SebastianAchilles!

[verdurin]

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 36 out of 36 (1 easyconfigs in total)
centos7.lan - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/42d674ecad45681669ea09ca1fd8f54e for a full test report.