Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: add amd toolchains #16037

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zemu-unile
Copy link
Contributor

depends on

Adds easyconfigs for toolchains in easybuilders/easybuild-framework#4058 with AOCC 3.2.0 and AOCL 3.2. GCC and OpenMPI versions are the same as in 2022a toolchains.

TODO:

  • should AOCC have a versionsuffix for GCCcore?
  • decide on which versioning to use. FFTW is using the upstream versioning 3.10. Everything else got the AOCL version (3.2)
  • should we add the non-foss AOCL libraries to the amd toolchain (see comments in amd-2022a.eb)
  • is there a way to get rid of the Rust dependency introduced by Python?

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented Aug 18, 2022

@zemu-unile thanks for kicking off an AMD toolchain PR!

should AOCC have a versionsuffix for GCCcore?

in keeping with e.g. intel-compilers, no, a versionsuffix is not necessary

should we add the non-foss AOCL libraries to the amd toolchain (see comments in amd-2022a.eb)

this should be opt-in IMO

is there a way to get rid of the Rust dependency introduced by Python?

nope, it's required because Python's cryptography>3.4 package is written in Rust

@Micket
Copy link
Contributor

Micket commented Aug 19, 2022

Rust/cryptography discussion here: #14320 (I suspect we are moving in a direction where more and more python packages will be using Rust though, so i suspect this might be a bit inevitable)

@Micket Micket added the new label Aug 19, 2022
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Nov 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants