{lib}[foss/2022a] TensorFlow v2.10.1 w/ Python 3.10.4

[Flamefire]

(created using eb --new-pr)

I'm working on TF 2.11.0 but that is causing me some trouble, so adding this as an intermediate in addition to 2.9.1

Edit: I think I got TF 2.11.0 working and will open a PR at start of February as it needs polishing. So if that is short enough to skip TF 2.10.1 then this can be closed.

Edit2: TF 2.11.0 PR is at #17241

[Flamefire]

Test report by @Flamefire
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
taurusi8028 - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor (zen2), 8 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB, 470.57.02, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/212c88f429c4ff50eecf7fbc5fbfc7cd for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
taurusml20 - Linux RHEL 7.6, POWER, 8335-GTX (power9le), 6 x NVIDIA Tesla V100-SXM2-32GB, 440.64.00, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/6e3205a258932d259e9b9b7768e34df1 for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

Test report by @Flamefire
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
taurusa12 - Linux CentOS Linux 7.7.1908, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz (broadwell), 3 x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 460.32.03, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/64fa1eb28489f488c5402fb393ca3e1b for a full test report.

[smoors]

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17168 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17168 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 10470

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1468375615 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[branfosj]

I think the CUDA version will require the changes in easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2854

[smoors]

Test report by @smoors
FAILED
Build succeeded for 5 out of 6 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node406.hydra.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 515.48.07, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/172b9493193381a875dfa95ac919077a for a full test report.

[smoors]

Test report by @smoors
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2854
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node400.hydra.os - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor, 1 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 515.48.07, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/07e83804377fc37e815157ab0b42220f for a full test report.

[branfosj]

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/4ac9519ae5c8bad6e1ad707a322212b3 for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

@branfosj As we have TF 2.11 and 2.9 do we still want this? I'd like to just skip 2.10 as I don't see any benefit in spending more time on this. However it would be important that #17092 gets merged, so we actually have the fixed 2.9.1

[casparvl]

Agreed, I'll close this.