{devel}[GCCcore/6.4.0] Qt5 5.10.1 + deps #6335
Conversation
|
Test report by @geimer |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @boegel |
|
Test report by @verdurin |
|
Test report by @verdurin |
|
@verdurin broken test report was because |
|
@boegel yes, I have a little menagerie of nodes across the UK for these tests, not all of which have lots of RAM... |
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| dependencies = [ | ||
| ('Python', '2.7.14', '-bare'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Before merging this, I'd like to settle the discussion on #5072
|
Thanks for clarifying @verdurin |
| version = '39.1.0' | ||
| versionsuffix = '-Python-%(pyver)s-bare' | ||
|
|
||
| homepage = 'http://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools/' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@geimer this should be reverted to https, unless there's a good reason for the change.
|
All but setuptools are codes that probably would benefit quite a lot from being compiled by Intel instead of GCC. So from my point of view they should be moved up a step in the toolchain. I.e., to GCC (or higher) instead of GCCcore, and then have an intel version of them too. And Qt5 5.10.1 needs, according to #7086, a gperf dependency. |
|
With #8201 being merged, this PR is now obsolete. |
|
Thanks for following up on this and closing the PR @geimer! |
Factored out from #6328