Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jimmy/update form template #396

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

Jimmy/update form template #396

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

lijmyeah
Copy link
Contributor

@lijmyeah lijmyeah commented Oct 29, 2024

依赖检查

组件之间的依赖声明,是微服务组件架构下的重要信息,请确保其正确性。

请勾选以下两组选项其中之一:

  • 本次 MR 没有使用上游组件(例如框架、后台组件等)的较新版本提供的特性。

或者:

  • 本次 MR 使用了上游组件(例如框架、后台组件等)的较新版本提供的特性。
  • 在对应的文件中更新了该上游组件的依赖版本(或确认了当前声明的依赖版本已包含本次 MR 使用的新特性)。

提交信息检查

Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG,请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符,并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。

破坏性变更是针对于下游使用者而言,可以通过本次改动对下游使用者的影响来识别变更类型:

  • 下游使用者不做任何改动,仍可以正常工作时,那么它属于普通变更。
  • 反之,下游使用者不做改动就无法正常工作时,那么它属于破坏性变更。

例如,构件修改了一个属性名,小产品 Storyboard 中需要使用新属性名才能工作,那么它就是破坏性变更。
又例如,构件还没有任何下游使用者,那么它的任何变更都是普通变更。

破坏性变更:

  • ⚠️ 本次 MR 包含破坏性变更的提交,请继续确认以下所有选项:
  • 没有更好的兼容方案,必须做破坏性变更。
  • 使用了 feat 作为提交类型。
  • 标注了 BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明
  • 同时更新了本仓库中所有下游使用者的调用。
  • 同时更新了本仓库中所有下游使用者对该子包的依赖为即将发布的 major 版本。
  • 同时为其它仓库的 Migrating 做好了准备,例如文档或批量改动的方法。
  • 手动验证过破坏性变更在 Migrate 后可以正常工作。
  • 破坏性变更所在的提交没有意外携带其它子包的改动。

新特性:

  • 本次 MR 包含新特性的提交,且该提交不带有破坏性变更,并使用了 feat 作为提交类型。
  • 给新特性添加了单元测试。
  • 手动验证过新特性可以正常工作。

问题修复:

  • 本次 MR 包含问题修复的提交,且该提交不带有新特性或破坏性变更,并使用了 fix 作为提交类型。
  • 给问题修复添加了单元测试。
  • 手动验证过问题修复得到解决。

杂项工作:

即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动,例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等:

  • 本次 MR 包含杂项工作的提交,且该提交不带有问题修复、新特性或破坏性变更,并使用了 chore, docs, test 等作为提交类型。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 引入了表单模板更新功能,允许用户更新表单模板并处理相关操作。
    • 增加了对更新表单模板的错误处理逻辑,确保在输入无效数据时返回中文错误信息。
  • 文档

    • 扩展了类型定义,新增了与表单模板更新相关的类型和接口。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Walkthrough

本次更改涉及多个文件的更新,主要集中在 @next-bricks/next-builder 包的 package.json 文件中,版本号更新至 1.278.16,并将 @next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk 的依赖版本从 ^1.2.2 升级至 ^2.0.0。此外,在 WorkbenchBackend 类中新增了处理表单模板更新的方法,并在相关测试中添加了新的动作处理和错误处理逻辑。最后,更新了类型定义以支持新的表单模板更新功能。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
bricks/next-builder/package.json 版本更新至 1.278.16,依赖 @next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk^1.2.2 升级至 ^2.0.0
bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.spec.ts 新增 update.formTemplate 动作处理,增强错误处理逻辑,确保在无效数据时返回中文错误信息。
bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.ts 新增 updateFormTemplate 方法,更新 QueueItem 类型以包含新动作,修改 batchDealRequest 方法以处理新动作类型。
types/preview/index.d.ts 新增类型 FormProjectApi_UpdateFormTemplateRequestBodyupdateFormTemplateArgs,新增接口 WorkbenchBackendActionForUpdateFormTemplate

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
types/preview/index.d.ts (1)

725-729: 建议添加接口说明文档

接口定义结构合理,但建议添加 JSDoc 注释来说明接口的用途和参数含义,以提高代码的可维护性。

建议添加如下文档注释:

+/**
+ * 表单模板更新动作的接口定义
+ * @extends {WorkbencdBackendCacheActionCommon}
+ */
export interface WorkbenchBackendActionForUpdateFormTemplate
  extends WorkbencdBackendCacheActionCommon {
  action: "update.formTemplate";
  args: updateFormTemplateArgs;
}
bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.ts (1)

20-20: 导入语句的位置需要调整

导入语句的位置应该与其他 form-builder-service-sdk 的导入保持一致,建议将其移动到相邻位置。

  FormProjectApi_updateFormItem,
  FormProjectApi_deleteFormItem,
  FormProjectApi_createFormItem,
+ FormProjectApi_updateFormTemplate,
} from "@next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk";
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce9a23e and 2a87329.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • bricks/next-builder/package.json (1 hunks)
  • bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.ts (6 hunks)
  • types/preview/index.d.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
bricks/next-builder/package.json (1)

49-49: 请确认依赖升级的影响范围

form-builder-service-sdk 从 1.x 升级到 2.x 是一个主版本升级,可能包含破坏性更改。建议:

  1. 确认是否已经适配了所有破坏性更改
  2. 在 CHANGELOG 中记录相关变更
  3. 确保下游使用方都已经了解并处理相关影响

运行以下脚本以检查可能受影响的代码:

✅ Verification successful

Let's gather more information about the specific usage of the SDK to understand the potential impact of the breaking changes.


Let's check the CHANGELOG and test file to understand the changes better.


Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:

依赖升级影响范围已确认

@next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk 从 1.x 升级到 2.x 的影响范围已确认:

  • 仅在 WorkbenchBackend.ts 中使用了该 SDK 的以下方法:
    • FormProjectApi_createFormItem
    • FormProjectApi_updateFormItem
    • FormProjectApi_deleteFormItem
    • FormProjectApi_updateFormTemplate
  • 相关单元测试已经完整覆盖这些方法的调用场景
  • 这些方法的使用方式简单,仅涉及基本的参数传递和返回值处理
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查 form-builder-service-sdk 的使用情况
# 预期结果:找到所有使用该 SDK 的地方,以便进行兼容性检查

echo "检查 form-builder-service-sdk 的导入..."
rg -l "from.*@next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk"

echo "检查 form-builder-service-sdk 的具体使用..."
rg -A 3 "import.*@next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk"

Length of output: 820


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查 WorkbenchBackend.ts 中的具体使用情况
echo "检查 WorkbenchBackend.ts 中的 SDK 使用..."
cat "bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.ts"

# 检查是否有相关的测试文件
echo -e "\n检查相关测试文件..."
fd "WorkbenchBackend.(spec|test).(ts|tsx|js|jsx)"

# 检查是否存在 CHANGELOG
echo -e "\n检查 CHANGELOG..."
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" bricks/next-builder/

# 检查 package-lock.json 中的依赖信息
echo -e "\n检查 package-lock.json 中的依赖信息..."
rg "@next-sdk/form-builder-service-sdk" package-lock.json

Length of output: 22990


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查 CHANGELOG 内容
echo "检查 CHANGELOG 内容..."
cat "bricks/next-builder/CHANGELOG.md"

# 检查测试文件中的相关用例
echo -e "\n检查测试文件中的相关用例..."
cat "bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.spec.ts"

# 检查 form-builder-service-sdk 的具体使用
echo -e "\n检查 SDK 的具体使用..."
rg "FormProjectApi_" -A 2 "bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.ts"

Length of output: 233721

types/preview/index.d.ts (2)

20-23: 导入语句结构清晰,类型定义完整

导入语句遵循了 TypeScript 最佳实践,新增的类型定义与现有的表单相关类型保持一致。


700-704: 类型定义符合现有模式

updateFormTemplateArgs 类型定义遵循了现有的表单操作类型定义模式,参数类型完整且合理。

bricks/next-builder/src/shared/workbench/WorkbenchBackend.ts (1)

701-703: 处理表单模板更新的 case 实现正确

新增的 case 分支逻辑符合现有代码模式,实现正确。

@gdutzhendong gdutzhendong merged commit 51c0f01 into master Oct 29, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants