FIX: Recursive batch flush can save beans in wrong order #3148
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
if you try to save a persist graph, you normally expect, that the elements are in a logical order.
Here:
OR
This works fine, if no batch flush occur.
Now, it can happen, that during save of customer 1, something (a DB.find in a postInsert hook, a lazy load) triggers a batch flush, which causes to process all internal save queues NOW.
As ebean is currently processing the "customer" query, and the next step of saving customer 2 is interrupted by the flush,
ebean tries to save contact a,b,c + d,e,f - the later three will fail, because customer 2 is not yet saved and has no ID.
As suggested solution, we disable
transaction.setFlushOnQuery
in the executeNow.Roland
Co-authored-by: Noemi Praml noemi.praml@foconis.de
Co-authored-by: Roland Praml roland.praml@foconis.de