Feat surplus invariant #785
Conversation
|
|
|
WalkthroughThe recent updates bring a holistic transformation to the contract ecosystem, emphasizing TWAP integration, CDP management refinement, and enhanced price feed mechanisms using Chainlink adapters. Governance processes are streamlined, debt and collateral handling is refined, and system robustness is fortified through mathematical safeguards and improved testing frameworks. These changes aim to elevate system integrity, efficiency, and user experience. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/contracts/contracts/TestContracts/invariants/TargetFunctions.sol (3 hunks)
- packages/contracts/foundry_test/EchidnaToFoundry.t.sol (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/contracts/contracts/TestContracts/invariants/TargetFunctions.sol
Additional comments: 1
packages/contracts/foundry_test/EchidnaToFoundry.t.sol (1)
- 1678-1693: The new test function
test_debugTheLiquidationis added for liquidation testing. Ensure that this test covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases for liquidation. It's also important to verify that the test does not expose any sensitive information or interact with real assets in a way that could be harmful if executed in a live environment.
dapp-whisperer
changed the base branch from
release-0.8
to
feat/flashloanFeeLoss
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/contracts/foundry_test/EchidnaToFoundry.t.sol (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
packages/contracts/foundry_test/EchidnaToFoundry.t.sol (3)
- 28-31: The logic in the
setupmodifier for determining theactorbased on the sender is a clever way to introduce variability in the test setup. However, ensure that the use ofmsg.senderin this context aligns with the intended test scenarios, asmsg.sendermight not vary in a predictable manner across test runs.- 37-37: The assignment of
actorin thesetUpfunction to use the address ofUSER1directly simplifies the actor setup for tests. This change seems to focus the test scenarios on a specific user context, which could be beneficial for targeted testing but might reduce the breadth of test coverage. Consider if additional variability in actor setup is needed for comprehensive testing.- 250-265: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [229-262]
Adding logging of prices and shares in the
_logStakesfunction enhances the visibility into test execution, which is crucial for debugging and understanding test outcomes. Ensure that the added logging statements provide sufficient detail and consider if any other key data points should be logged for a comprehensive understanding of the test state.
| { | ||
| modifier setup() override { | ||
| _; | ||
| address sender = uint160(msg.sender) % 3 == 0 ? address(USER1) : uint160(msg.sender) % 3 == 1 | ||
| ? address(USER2) | ||
| : address(USER3); | ||
| actor = actors[sender]; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function setUp() public { | ||
| _setUp(); | ||
| _setUpActors(); | ||
| actor = actors[USER1]; | ||
| vm.startPrank(address(actor)); | ||
| actor = actors[address(USER1)]; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function _checkTotals() internal { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [663-663]
AWS Access Key ID values detected in comments. Storing sensitive credentials, even in comments, poses a security risk. It's recommended to remove or obfuscate these values and ensure they are securely managed outside the codebase, such as through environment variables or secure secrets management solutions.
Also applies to: 694-694, 724-724, 942-942
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
EbtcFeedcontract for mainnet price feed connectivity.ActivePoolTwapAccTestfor TWAP functionality testing and various other test enhancements for contract functionality verification.Enhancements
Bug Fixes
Documentation
.gitignoreentries for better management of local deployment outputs and directories.Refactor
Tests