Amend list initialization sequence

[i-garrison]

• add more tests for list-initialization of class or aggregate
• amend list-initialization handling of class or aggregate

[i-garrison]

Hi @jonahgraham - hope this CI build issue is transient?

Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.31-0ubuntu9.9_amd64.deb

[jonahgraham]

Hi @jonahgraham - hope this CI build issue is transient?

Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.31-0ubuntu9.9_amd64.deb

There was a missing apt update in our script - fixed in #586 - please rebase changes once I merge #586 to pick up the fix.

[jonahgraham]

(My commit message in #586 referenced this PR in a way that caused it to be auto-closed. Re-opening)

[i-garrison]

Hi @jonahgraham would you believe we can get this merged before 11.4.0 cutoff date?

Mind that #448 is conflicting with his one but we have an agreement to prefer this (larger) change #448 (comment)

[jonahgraham]

At recent CDT calls we discussed how to handle reviews where there is insufficient expertise to review amongst existing committers and decided to accept such changes that look reasonable and appear sufficiently tested.

I have pushed a rebased version of this change.

[jonahgraham]

I bumped the cdt.ui and updated the dep on cdt core to make sure the method with the new parameter is properly picked up.