Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make "AllTests" more specific #1487

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jukzi
Copy link
Contributor

@jukzi jukzi commented Jul 2, 2024

Avoid duplicate class names to make it easier to find the right one

@jukzi jukzi requested review from jjohnstn July 2, 2024 15:18
Copy link
Contributor

@jjohnstn jjohnstn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have a strong opinion on this unless if affects reporting (do the checks account for tests being renamed?). I notice that jdt.ui.tests use TestSuite in the name. This is done here for the NLSTestSuite, so, for example, maybe using CCPTestSuite vs AllRefactoringCCPTests might be more compact and to the point and be more consistent with jdt.ui.tests.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Contributor

Is this still of interest for anyone?

Avoid duplicate class names to make it easier to find the right one
@jukzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

jukzi commented Jan 2, 2025

maybe using CCPTestSuite vs AllRefactoringCCPTests might be more compact and to the point and be more consistent with jdt.ui.tests.

updated to using "TestSuite" suffix

@jukzi jukzi requested a review from akurtakov January 2, 2025 11:22
Copy link
Contributor

@akurtakov akurtakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jjohnstn jjohnstn merged commit 2213f68 into eclipse-jdt:master Jan 3, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants