-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix (jkube-kit/config/service) : Preserve Assembly Image Layers for Non-S2I Builds (#2379) #2413
Conversation
…of OpenShift S2I build strategy (eclipse-jkube#2379) Do not flatten image assembly layers in case of build strategy other than S2I. Signed-off-by: Rohan Kumar <rohaan@redhat.com>
Eclipse JKube CI ReportStarted new GH workflow run for #2413 (2023-10-10T08:13:45Z) ⚙️ JKube E2E Tests (6453779601)
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs 85.7% Coverage The version of Java (11.0.18) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2413 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 59.36% 61.10% +1.74%
- Complexity 4586 4797 +211
============================================
Files 500 518 +18
Lines 21211 21394 +183
Branches 2830 2826 -4
============================================
+ Hits 12591 13072 +481
+ Misses 7370 7101 -269
+ Partials 1250 1221 -29
... and 68 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Perhaps the title and description could be condensed into a single concise sentence. What do you think of:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor title request change but LGTM otherwise
Description
Fix #2379
Preserve Assembly Image Layers for Non-S2I Builds
Type of change
test, version modification, documentation, etc.)
Checklist