-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x64 JIT support for virtual threads (Loom) #15552
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
64f6eea
Add FrontEnd functions for Loom J9VMThread fields
0xdaryl 4e72e0a
Add J9VMThread virtual thread counter field offsets to jilconsts.inc
0xdaryl 00eaaad
Adjust J9VMThread callOutCount counters around x64 direct JNI dispatch
0xdaryl 017fbc2
Remove code guarded with J9VM_OPT_REAL_TIME_LOCKING_SUPPORT
0xdaryl a706ad8
Remove unnecessary snippet restart label
0xdaryl aeb3082
Make JAVA_SPEC_VERSION macro available to JIT assembly code
0xdaryl 9c2fe66
Adjust J9VMThread ownedMonitorCount counters for x64 monenter/monexit
0xdaryl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On monitor entry and exit code, we only update the counter if it is >= Java19 and 64-Bit platform, should we be guarding the code with 64-Bit platform check as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. This file is specific to 64-bit only (AMD64) and an additional 64-bit check would be redundant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should have look at that more carefully, thanks a lot for pointing this out.
Though, I actually want to see if @gacholio's suggestion on Z PR for Loom #15752 (comment) also applies to all other codegens?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is really a policy decision, not a technical one. It's quite unlikely that 32-bit will make a return, though Z is perhaps the one place where it might be requested.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot @gacholio for the explanation. It makes sense.