Skip to content

docs: flattend gh-pages structure #14

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dcalavrezo-qorix
Copy link

Flattened folder structure of the published gh-pages

gh-pages/
.................
│─ pr-42/ # PR #42 preview
│─ pr-99/ # PR #99 preview
│─ feature-x/ # Feature branch preview
│─ v17/ # Tagged release
│─ main/ # main branch

This was done in order to ensure proper cleaning ( avoiding race conditions and clutter). Thus the latest code should be referenced from the /main subfolder. Updated the accordingly.

@AlexanderLanin
Copy link
Member

Do we want this or redirect from the root? Or both?

I guess the redirect from root to main we need for sure. Which would make this PR optional.

@dcalavrezo-qorix dcalavrezo-qorix force-pushed the dcalavrezo_docs_PR_preview branch 3 times, most recently from 3eb82ba to 27b1dcc Compare February 12, 2025 07:43
Flattened folder structure of the published gh-pages

gh-pages/
.................
│─ pr-42/ # PR #42 preview
│─ pr-99/ # PR #99 preview
│─ feature-x/ # Feature branch preview
│─ v17/ # Tagged release
│─ main/ # main branch

This was done in order to ensure proper cleaning ( avoiding race conditions and clutter).
Thus the latest code should be refrenced from the /main subfolder.
Updated the <ref> accordingly.

Issue-ref: closes #269 eclipse-score/score#269

Signed-off-by: Dan Calavrezo <dan.calavrezo.ext@qorix.ai>
@dcalavrezo-qorix dcalavrezo-qorix force-pushed the dcalavrezo_docs_PR_preview branch from 27b1dcc to 68fe204 Compare February 12, 2025 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants