Remove a quick fix that removes both annotations when the two are mutually exclusive #539
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ually exclusive Signed-off-by: Paul Gooderham <turkeyonmarblerye@gmail.com>
turkeylurkey
changed the title
ajm01
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request #511 added a quick fix which removes all three annotations from a parameter when some of the annotations are in conflict. E.g. "@Disposes @observes @ObservesAsync String name" There should be two quick fixes, one that removes @Disposes and one that removes @observes and @ObservesAsync.
In this pull request we temporarily remove the quick fix from two situations along with the tests that validate them. There is an issue open to fix the code so we can restore the quick fix.