-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on … #898
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f32ae95
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 6248d21
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 3194c6a
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 91f2bdd
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 8bcda4e
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 7a4e426
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 6c4875c
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient' on …
lefex 6e994ef
fix: Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'createRadialGradient'
lefex File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ describe('Path', function () { | |
cy: 625.5, | ||
startAngle: -1.5707963267948966, | ||
endAngle: 4.71238898038469, | ||
innerCornerRadius: 5, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This change seems to be unnecessary? |
||
// innerCornerRadius: 5, | ||
r: 218.92499999999998, | ||
r0: 93.825 | ||
}, | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems only one number needs to be check positive. In this case I will prefer keeping the
isSafeNum
simpler and more cohesion that only accept one parameternumber
. Monomorphic function is always better than polymorphic function, on both code style and performance.So the
r
check can be