[buffermgrd] Move switch-statement outside of if-statement in BufferMgr::doTask #7
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…gr::doTask (#3055) * [buffermgr] Moved switch statement outside of if-statmement in Buffermgr::doTask The switch statement which would normally erase buffer events was moved to be inside the if-statement which would only enter if the event is a SET event. This was introduced in commit e5329c39. This would cause an infinite loop, since non-set events would never be erased. The switch statement has now been moved to occur outside the if, allowing for non-set commands to be processed.
|
cherry pick from sonic-net/sonic-swss@91bacca |
link19430
pushed a commit
to link19430/sonic-swss-ec
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2024
**What I did**
Fix the Mem Leak by moving the raw pointers in type_maps to use smart pointers
**Why I did it**
```
Indirect leak of 83776 byte(s) in 476 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f0a2a414647 in operator new(unsigned long) ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:99
edge-core#1 0x5555590cc923 in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::allocate(unsigned long, void const*) /usr/include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:115
edge-core#2 0x5555590cc923 in std::allocator_traits, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > > >::allocate(std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >&, unsigned long) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:460
edge-core#3 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_get_node() /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:584
edge-core#4 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_node, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >* std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_create_node, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:634
edge-core#5 0x5555590cc923 in std::_Rb_tree_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > std::_Rb_tree, std::allocator >, std::pair, std::allocator > const, referenced_object>, std::_Select1st, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::_M_emplace_hint_unique, std::allocator > const&>, std::tuple<> >(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> >, std::piecewise_construct_t const&, std::tuple, std::allocator > const&>&&, std::tuple<>&&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_tree.h:2461
edge-core#6 0x5555590e8757 in std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) /usr/include/c++/10/bits/stl_map.h:501
edge-core#7 0x5555590d48b0 in Orch::setObjectReference(std::map, std::allocator >, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, std::map, std::allocator >, referenced_object, std::less, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > const, referenced_object> > >*> > >&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&) orchagent/orch.cpp:450
edge-core#8 0x5555594ff66b in QosOrch::handleQueueTable(Consumer&, std::tuple, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator >, std::vector, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator >, std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > > > > >&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:1763
edge-core#9 0x5555594edbd6 in QosOrch::doTask(Consumer&) orchagent/qosorch.cpp:2179
edge-core#10 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:241
edge-core#11 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::drain() orchagent/orch.cpp:238
edge-core#12 0x5555590c8743 in Consumer::execute() orchagent/orch.cpp:235
edge-core#13 0x555559090dad in OrchDaemon::start() orchagent/orchdaemon.cpp:755
edge-core#14 0x555558e9be25 in main orchagent/main.cpp:766
edge-core#15 0x7f0a299b6d09 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x23d09)
```
|
@chiourung The title and PR description are incomplete, could you update it |
chiourung
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The switch statement which would normally erase buffer events was moved to be inside the if-statement which would only enter if the event is a SET event. This was introduced in commit e5329c39.
This would cause an infinite loop, since non-set events would never be erased.
The switch statement has now been moved to occur outside the if, allowing for non-set commands to be processed.
What I did
Why I did it
How I verified it
Details if related