fix(snap): configure kuiper's REST service port

[MonicaisHer]

change kuiper's rest service port to 59720
so that this service can be used by edgex
fix: #3771
Signed-off-by: Mengyi mengyi.wang@canonical.com

If your build fails due to your commit message not passing the build checks, please review the guidelines here: https://github.com/edgexfoundry/edgex-go/blob/main/.github/Contributing.md

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• I am not introducing a breaking change (if you are, flag in conventional commit message with BREAKING CHANGE: describing the break)
• I am not introducing a new dependency (add notes below if you are)
• I have added unit tests for the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have fully tested (add details below) this the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have opened a PR for the related docs change (if not, why?)

Testing Instructions

Test guidline

snapcraft and install snap:

git clone https://github.com/MonicaisHer/edgex-go.git
cd edgex-go
git checkout snap-modify-kuiper-rest-port
snapcraft
sudo snap install edgexfoundry_2.0.1-dev.71_amd64.snap --dangerous

enable kuiper service and check its restful api port:

snap set edgexfoundry kuiper=on
snap logs edgexfoundry.kuiper | grep 59720

expect:

2021-10-22T13:08:36Z edgexfoundry.kuiper[14607]: time="2021-10-22 15:08:36" level=info msg="Serving kuiper (version - 1.3.0) on port 20498, and restful api on http://localhost:59720. \n" file="server/server.go:163"
2021-10-22T13:08:36Z edgexfoundry.kuiper[14607]: Serving kuiper (version - 1.3.0) on port 20498, and restful api on http://localhost:59720.

New Dependency Instructions (If applicable)

[MonicaisHer]

@siggiskulason Could you please help me add you, @farshidtz and @tonyespy as reviewers? Thank you!

[farshidtz]

It does the job. Please squash and merge.

In future, we may want to pass this and other build-stage config items as parts.<part-name>.build-environment to add more visibility into what is being set.

Thanks @MonicaisHer

[siggiskulason]

LGTM. Thank you for the test instructions which were clear and to the point. I confirmed that this works as expected.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication