Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: export handleRequest on application #10

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Jul 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a Contributors section in the README with links to contributor images.
    • Updated package.json to include caching for the lint script and a new module field for ES modules.
  • Chores

    • Added .eslintcache to .gitignore.
    • Updated AUTHORS file with new contributor names.
  • Refactor

    • Changed handleRequest method from private to protected in the Application class.
  • Style

    • Simplified ESLint configuration by removing a specific rule enforcement.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Warning

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This update includes enhancements across several files, such as simplifying ESLint configuration by removing a specific rule, updating contributor information, adjusting visibility and signatures of methods in the Application class, ignoring ESLint cache files with .gitignore, and optimizing script commands and module fields in package.json.

Changes

Files Summary
.eslintrc Removed specific rule enforcement extension to simplify the ESLint configuration.
README.md, AUTHORS Updated contributor information and added sections for contributors in README.md.
src/application.ts Changed #handleRequest from a private to a protected method, adjusting its signature.
.gitignore Added .eslintcache to ignored files.
package.json Added caching to the lint script and introduced an ES module field to the distribution.

Poem

In code we trust, with changes grand,
Rules trimmed down for configs to stand,
Contributors join, images shine,
Handling requests now redefined.
Cache ignored, scripts set to run,
Modular paths—we've just begun!
To future strides, the code's now spun 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

commit: e8e6c91

@eggjs/koa

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/eggjs/koa/@eggjs/koa@10


templates

@fengmk2 fengmk2 self-assigned this Jul 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (14aa2c5) to head (5365735).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #10   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines         1648      1648           
  Branches       300       300           
=========================================
  Hits          1648      1648           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5db7a9e and 5365735.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .eslintrc (1 hunks)
  • Readme.md (2 hunks)
  • src/application.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .eslintrc
  • Readme.md
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/application.ts (1)

Line range hint 189-197:
LGTM! But verify the method usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. The method handleRequest was changed from private to protected and updated to be asynchronous.

However, ensure that all method calls to handleRequest align with the new access level and async nature.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Method handleRequest usage aligns with new access level and async nature.

The method handleRequest is used asynchronously and the access level change is consistent throughout the codebase.

  • src/application.ts: Lines showing correct usage and definition of handleRequest.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all method calls to `handleRequest` align with the new access level and async nature.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type typescript $'handleRequest'

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all method calls to `handleRequest` align with the new access level and async nature.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg 'handleRequest' --glob '*.ts'

Length of output: 374

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit dfda217 into master Jul 7, 2024
18 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the export-handleRequest branch July 7, 2024 14:35
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2024
[skip ci]

## [2.18.5](v2.18.4...v2.18.5) (2024-07-07)

### Bug Fixes

* export handleRequest on application ([#10](#10)) ([dfda217](dfda217))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant