-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: should export ContextDelegation and Context both #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes across the files primarily involve updating the import statements to use ES6 destructuring syntax, modifying type aliases, and adjusting export declarations. This refactoring focuses on replacing default exports with named exports and refining the use of type annotations for improved code clarity and maintainability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)The changes do not introduce new features or modify the control flow in a significant way, so no sequence diagram is necessary for this update. Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 1635 1634 -1
Branches 295 295
=========================================
- Hits 1635 1634 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/response.ts (2)
Line range hint
9-9
: Rename the variableescape
to avoid shadowing the global property.- import escape from 'escape-html'; + import escapeHtml from 'escape-html';
Line range hint
307-310
: This getter should return a value to ensure consistent behavior.- get type() { + get type() { + return this.res.getHeaders()['content-type'].split(';', 1)[0]; + }src/request.ts (2)
Line range hint
311-311
: Ensure that the getter returns a value to avoid unexpected behaviors.- get type() { + get type() { + return this.req.headers['content-type'].split(';', 1)[0]; + }
Line range hint
404-404
: Avoid assignments in expressions to maintain clarity and prevent side effects.- this.#memoizedURL = new URL(`${this.origin}${this.originalUrl}`); + this.#memoizedURL = new URL(`${this.origin}${this.originalurl}`); + return this.#memoizedURL;Also applies to: 546-546
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- src/application.ts (4 hunks)
- src/context.ts (1 hunks)
- src/request.ts (1 hunks)
- src/response.ts (1 hunks)
- test/application.test-d.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/context.ts
Additional context used
Biome
src/response.ts
[error] 9-9: Do not shadow the global "escape" property. (lint/suspicious/noShadowRestrictedNames)
Consider renaming this variable. It's easy to confuse the origin of variables when they're named after a known global.
[error] 307-310: This getter should return a value. (lint/suspicious/useGetterReturn)
src/request.ts
[error] 311-311: This return should return a value because it is located in a getter. (lint/suspicious/useGetterReturn)
[error] 404-404: The assignment should not be in an expression. (lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
[error] 546-546: The assignment should not be in an expression. (lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
Additional comments not posted (9)
test/application.test-d.ts (3)
2-2
: Correct usage of renamed importContextDelegation
from../src/index.js
.
11-11
: Correctly updated the type check to useContextDelegation
.
5-5
: Ensure that the type cast ofctx
toContextDelegation
is valid throughout the test suite.Verification successful
The search results show multiple instances of
ctx
being used across various test files. However, only the instance intest/application.test-d.ts
explicitly castsctx
toContextDelegation
. To ensure the type casting is valid, we need to verify howContextDelegation
is defined and used in the test suite.
The search did not return any results for the definition of
ContextDelegation
. This indicates thatContextDelegation
may not be defined as an interface in the codebase, or it might be imported from an external module.To proceed, we should search for any references to
ContextDelegation
to understand where it is coming from and how it is used.
The references to
ContextDelegation
indicate that it is imported from../src/index.js
and../../src/context.js
. To ensure the type casting is valid, we need to inspect the definition ofContextDelegation
in these files.
The search did not find the files
src/index.js
andsrc/context.js
, which suggests that the paths might be incorrect or the files might not exist. To proceed, we should search forContextDelegation
in the entiresrc
directory to locate its definition.
The search results indicate that
ContextDelegation
is defined as a type alias insrc/context.ts
:export type ContextDelegation = Context & Pick<Request, 'acceptsLanguages' | 'acceptsEncodings' | 'acceptsCharsets'>This means
ContextDelegation
is a combination ofContext
and selected properties fromRequest
. Given this definition, the type cast ofctx
toContextDelegation
intest/application.test-d.ts
appears to be valid.
test/application.test-d.ts
:
- Line 5:
const ctx = {} as ContextDelegation;
The type casting of
ctx
toContextDelegation
is consistent with its definition and usage throughout the test suite.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances of `ctx` are correctly typed as `ContextDelegation`. rg --type ts "ctx as ContextDelegation" test/application.test-d.tsLength of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all instances of `ctx` in the test suite to verify its type casting. rg --type ts "ctx" test/Length of output: 63094
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of `ContextDelegation` to verify its structure and usage. rg --type ts "interface ContextDelegation" --files-with-matches | xargs rg "interface ContextDelegation"Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all references to `ContextDelegation` to determine its source and usage. rg --type ts "ContextDelegation" test/Length of output: 468
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the definition of `ContextDelegation` in the source files. rg --type ts "ContextDelegation" src/index.js src/context.jsLength of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of `ContextDelegation` in the `src` directory. rg --type ts "ContextDelegation" src/Length of output: 1201
src/application.ts (2)
14-16
: Updated imports to use destructuring syntax which improves readability and consistency.
46-46
: Ensure thatProtoImplClass
type is correctly used throughout the application, especially since it's tied toContextDelegation
.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
ProtoImplClass
is defined as a generic type and used in multiple places withinsrc/application.ts
. Additionally,ContextDelegation
is imported fromcontext.js
and used across several files, includingsrc/application.ts
,src/request.ts
, andsrc/response.ts
.Given these findings, the usage of
ProtoImplClass<ContextDelegation>
appears to be consistent with the definitions and other usages. There are no apparent issues with howProtoImplClass<ContextDelegation>
is being utilized.
ProtoImplClass
is defined as a generic type:export type ProtoImplClass<T = object> = new(...args: any[]) => T;
ContextDelegation
is defined as a type that extendsContext
and includes specific properties fromRequest
.The review comment's concern about ensuring the correct usage of
ProtoImplClass<ContextDelegation>
has been addressed, and no issues were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `ProtoImplClass` with `ContextDelegation`. rg --type ts "ProtoImplClass<ContextDelegation>" src/Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the definition and other usages of `ProtoImplClass` rg --type ts "ProtoImplClass" src/ # Find the definition and other usages of `ContextDelegation` rg --type ts "ContextDelegation" src/Length of output: 1514
src/response.ts (2)
15-17
: Updated imports to use destructuring syntax, aligning with modern JavaScript practices.
19-19
: Transition from default to named export for theResponse
class enhances modularity and import clarity.src/request.ts (2)
13-15
: Updated imports to use destructuring syntax, aligning with modern TypeScript practices.
17-17
: Transition from default to named export for theRequest
class enhances modularity and import clarity.
@@ -82,7 +81,7 @@ export class Application extends Emitter { | |||
this.middleware = []; | |||
this.ctxStorage = getAsyncLocalStorage(); | |||
this.silent = false; | |||
this.ContextClass = class ApplicationContext extends Context {}; | |||
this.ContextClass = class ApplicationContext extends Context {} as any; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The extracted methods and properties from the base classes Context
, Request
, and Response
show a comprehensive list of functionalities. However, the extended classes ApplicationContext
, ApplicationRequest
, and ApplicationResponse
do not seem to implement or override these methods and properties, as they are mostly empty or contain minimal logic.
ApplicationContext
extendsContext
but does not add any new methods or properties.ApplicationRequest
extendsRequest
but also does not add any new methods or properties.ApplicationResponse
extendsResponse
and similarly does not add new methods or properties.
Given this information, it appears that the extended classes are not implementing the expected behaviors of their base classes.
- src/application.ts: Ensure
ApplicationContext
,ApplicationRequest
, andApplicationResponse
implement or override the necessary methods and properties fromContext
,Request
, andResponse
respectively.
Analysis chain
Ensure the extended classes (ApplicationContext
, ApplicationRequest
, ApplicationResponse
) are properly implementing the expected behaviors of their base classes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify correct behavior implementation in extended classes.
rg --type ts -A 10 "class ApplicationContext" src/application.ts
rg --type ts -A 10 "class ApplicationRequest" src/application.ts
rg --type ts -A 10 "class ApplicationResponse" src/application.ts
Length of output: 1201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate the definitions of the base classes and examine their methods and properties.
rg --type ts "class Context"
rg --type ts "class Request"
rg --type ts "class Response"
Length of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract methods and properties from the base classes and compare them with the extended classes.
# Extract methods and properties from the base classes
echo "Methods and properties in Context:"
rg --type ts --pcre2 --only-matching -N "(public|protected|private|static)?\s*(async\s*)?(get|set)?\s*\w+\(.*\)\s*{?" src/context.ts
echo "Methods and properties in Request:"
rg --type ts --pcre2 --only-matching -N "(public|protected|private|static)?\s*(async\s*)?(get|set)?\s*\w+\(.*\)\s*{?" src/request.ts
echo "Methods and properties in Response:"
rg --type ts --pcre2 --only-matching -N "(public|protected|private|static)?\s*(async\s*)?(get|set)?\s*\w+\(.*\)\s*{?" src/response.ts
# Compare with the extended classes
echo "Methods and properties in ApplicationContext:"
rg --type ts --pcre2 --only-matching -N "(public|protected|private|static)?\s*(async\s*)?(get|set)?\s*\w+\(.*\)\s*{?" src/application.ts
echo "Methods and properties in ApplicationRequest:"
rg --type ts --pcre2 --only-matching -N "(public|protected|private|static)?\s*(async\s*)?(get|set)?\s*\w+\(.*\)\s*{?" src/application.ts
echo "Methods and properties in ApplicationResponse:"
rg --type ts --pcre2 --only-matching -N "(public|protected|private|static)?\s*(async\s*)?(get|set)?\s*\w+\(.*\)\s*{?" src/application.ts
Length of output: 13463
[skip ci] ## [2.18.2](v2.18.1...v2.18.2) (2024-06-15) ### Bug Fixes * should export ContextDelegation and Context both ([#7](#7)) ([b26b549](b26b549))
Summary by CodeRabbit
Context
toContextDelegation
for better clarity and consistency.These changes help in improving code readability and maintainability but don't impact the end-user experience directly.