-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add association between raw tracker/calorimeter hit and tracker/calorimeter hit #86
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! I think this adds the remaining links at the input of the tracker and calorimeter chains.
We discussed this yesterday and we think there is no need for a weight in the TrackerHit and CalorimeterHit, nor is there a need for a OneToManyRelations in these data types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was discussed quite extensively previously in reco meetings. The change looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice!
Reco always matches with one raw hit
…mbiguity in nomenclature.
a0eb84c
to
cd75170
Compare
This reverts commit cd75170.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Backwards compatible change.
…ucted tracker/calorimeter hit (#1535) ### Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Add one-to-one relation with raw tracker/calorimeter hit for reconstructed tracker/calorimeter hit. Contingent on eic/EDM4eic#86. ### What kind of change does this PR introduce? - [ ] Bug fix (issue #__) - [ ] New feature (issue #__) - [ ] Documentation update - [ ] Other: __ ### Please check if this PR fulfills the following: - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added - [ ] Documentation has been added / updated - [ ] Changes have been communicated to collaborators ### Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code? ### Does this PR change default behavior? --------- Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dmitry Kalinkin <dmitry.kalinkin@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Wouter Deconinck <wdconinc@gmail.com>
Briefly, what does this PR introduce?
Add association between raw tracker hit and tracker hit to have full association path from MCParticle to tracker hit.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?
Does this PR change default behavior?