-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Elasticsearch/audit fileset fails with grok failure #10035
Labels
Comments
ycombinator
changed the title
Elasticsearch/audit fileset should handle indices field in log
Elasticsearch/audit fileset should handle indices and roles fields in log
Jan 12, 2019
ycombinator
changed the title
Elasticsearch/audit fileset should handle indices and roles fields in log
Elasticsearch/audit fileset should handle more fields in log
Jan 12, 2019
ycombinator
changed the title
Elasticsearch/audit fileset should handle more fields in log
Elasticsearch/audit fileset fails with grok failure
Jan 16, 2019
Pinging @elastic/stack-monitoring |
ycombinator
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2019
…me (#10135) Resolves #10035. This PR: * Uses `DATA` instead of `WORD` in the grok pattern for parsing out `elasticsearch.node.name`, * Breaks out the grok pattern into pattern definitions to increase readability * Removes a redundant `?` after a `*` in the grok pattern (between `elasticsearch.audit.action` and `elasticsearch.audit.uri`), and * Properly reindents the pipeline JSON (so you might want to view the diff with `?w=1` appended to the URL)
ycombinator
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2019
… lenient in parsing node name (#10174) Cherry-pick of PR #10135 to 6.x branch. Original message: Resolves #10035. This PR: * Uses `DATA` instead of `WORD` in the grok pattern for parsing out `elasticsearch.node.name`, * Breaks out the grok pattern into pattern definitions to increase readability * Removes a redundant `?` after a `*` in the grok pattern (between `elasticsearch.audit.action` and `elasticsearch.audit.uri`), and * Properly reindents the pipeline JSON (so you might want to view the diff with `?w=1` appended to the URL)
ycombinator
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2019
… lenient in parsing node name (#10465) Cherry-pick of PR #10135 to 6.6 branch. Original message: Resolves #10035. This PR: * Uses `DATA` instead of `WORD` in the grok pattern for parsing out `elasticsearch.node.name`, * Breaks out the grok pattern into pattern definitions to increase readability * Removes a redundant `?` after a `*` in the grok pattern (between `elasticsearch.audit.action` and `elasticsearch.audit.uri`), and * Properly reindents the pipeline JSON (so you might want to view the diff with `?w=1` appended to the URL)
leweafan
pushed a commit
to leweafan/beats
that referenced
this issue
Apr 28, 2023
…be more lenient in parsing node name (elastic#10465) Cherry-pick of PR elastic#10135 to 6.6 branch. Original message: Resolves elastic#10035. This PR: * Uses `DATA` instead of `WORD` in the grok pattern for parsing out `elasticsearch.node.name`, * Breaks out the grok pattern into pattern definitions to increase readability * Removes a redundant `?` after a `*` in the grok pattern (between `elasticsearch.audit.action` and `elasticsearch.audit.uri`), and * Properly reindents the pipeline JSON (so you might want to view the diff with `?w=1` appended to the URL)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Observed on
master
.The
elasticsearch/audit
fileset does not know how to parse the following log line:It fails with the following error:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: