-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Opt-out mechanism for libbeat fields #11535
Comments
For me the topic of excluding fields and features is directly coupled. We started to have more local There is still the issue with the |
Sure, ideally we'd tackle the features part, I was hoping we could start small since we already have a (poor) workaround for the feature support bit.
fields.yml is still used for generating documentation so only the latter would be sufficient for APM needs. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Describe the enhancement:
Following on from #11474 (comment), this issues intends to start a discussion around mechanism for selectively inheriting libbeat fields.
305 default libbeat fields as of 692ef9e
Per that discussion, there is a related, but separate, topic for excluding support for libbeat features altogether. For now, that's handled mostly by omitting documentation from APM server for features that don't make sense / aren't supported there.
Describe a specific use case for the enhancement or feature:
Since APM server is built in on libbeat, all of these fields end up in APM's index templates, documentation, etc. While APM currently excludes all of the autoprovider fields from the original issue, it will be unable to selectively include others later, without tricks or actual support from libbeat. I expect the same concern exists for other libbeat users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: