Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version of threatintel/recordedfuture dataset #30030

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 1, 2022

Conversation

adriansr
Copy link
Contributor

@adriansr adriansr commented Jan 26, 2022

What does this PR do?

This is a new implementation of the Recorded Future integration in the threatintel module. Uses the risklist API endpoints to fetch threat indicators in CSV format, while also supports ingesting from a custom URL (for Fusion Files) and from already-downloaded CSV files.

Why is it important?

The previous implementation of the Recorded Future API was unsupported as it used the wrong API to download indicators from Recorded Future.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Pending tasks

  • Update the dashboard, most fields are missing from this new API. This will be done in a separate PR.

Screenshots

image

This is a new implementation of the Recorded Future integration in the
threatintel module. Uses the `risklist` API endpoints to fetch threat
indicators in CSV format, while also supports ingesting from a custom
URL (for Fusion Files) and from CSV files.

The previous implementation was unsupported as it used the wrong API to
download indicators from Recorded Future.
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/security-external-integrations (Team:Security-External Integrations)

@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Jan 26, 2022
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 26, 2022

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @adriansr? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-v./d./d./d is the label to automatically backport to the 7./d branch. /d is the digit

NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.

@mergify mergify bot added the backport-skip Skip notification from the automated backport with mergify label Jan 26, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Jan 26, 2022

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Reason: null

  • Start Time: 2022-01-27T18:22:02.148+0000

  • Duration: 105 min 39 sec

  • Commit: a17a794

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 9636
Skipped 1282
Total 10918

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@adriansr adriansr added the backport-v8.1.0 Automated backport with mergify label Jan 26, 2022
@adriansr adriansr requested review from marius-dr, P1llus and a team and removed request for marius-dr January 26, 2022 17:01
@mergify mergify bot removed the backport-skip Skip notification from the automated backport with mergify label Jan 26, 2022
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
"size": 10
},
"scale": "ordinal",
"sourceField": "recordedfuture.risk.criticalityLabel"
"sourceField": "recordedfuture.criticality_label"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this field defined? I can't find it referenced anywhere else. Should there be a rename/copy from recordedfuture.evidence_details[:].CriticalityLabel?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was a mistake to push that change. Turns out the criticality_label field is not reliable from this new API so the code that populated it was removed. We will address the dashboard changes in a different PR as it'll be necessary to remove a few visualisations (like this one) because the data is not available anymore.

@adriansr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test

Dashboard will be fixed in a separate PR
@adriansr adriansr requested a review from efd6 January 27, 2022 18:22
Copy link
Contributor

@efd6 efd6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but please wait for @P1llus

@adriansr adriansr merged commit fbcece6 into elastic:master Feb 1, 2022
@adriansr adriansr deleted the rf_new_api branch February 1, 2022 09:19
adriansr added a commit to adriansr/beats that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Relates elastic#30030

Co-authored-by: Andrew Pease <7442091+peasead@users.noreply.github.com>
adriansr added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2022
Relates #30030

Co-authored-by: Andrew Pease <7442091+peasead@users.noreply.github.com>
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2022
Relates #30030

Co-authored-by: Andrew Pease <7442091+peasead@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit b8203a3)
adriansr added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2022
Relates #30030

Co-authored-by: Andrew Pease <7442091+peasead@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit b8203a3)

Co-authored-by: Adrian Serrano <adrisr83@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants