-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for float type in mapstriface #6870
Conversation
Extracted from elastic#6807
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small typo, other than that LGTM.
func toFloat(key string, data map[string]interface{}) (interface{}, error) { | ||
emptyIface, exists := data[key] | ||
if !exists { | ||
return 0, fmt.Errorf("Key %s not found", key) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/Key/key/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed
return 0, fmt.Errorf("Key %s not found", key) | ||
} | ||
switch emptyIface.(type) { | ||
case float64: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should string
be accepted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 on parsing string via strconv.ParseFloat
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So far we don't need it and it's also not supported in the Int type. I would add it when we need it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I've reviewed this, I've made the same conclusion by look at the int
handling.
@andrewkroh @urso for me its not necessary right now, wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That’s fine by me to omit it for now. It’s an easy add at any point.
Extracted from #6807