Skip to content

Conversation

eedugon
Copy link
Contributor

@eedugon eedugon commented Oct 7, 2025

This PR describes that the Stack 9.2 supports IPv6 addresses when configuring a remote cluster within Kibana.

I don't want to highlight that much in our docs, as it doesn't feel necessary (we didn't even mention that we supported IPv4 at all, neither that IPv6 wasn't supported by Kibana (it was supported by Elasticsearch)).

Extra improvements:

  • The ECE -> self-managed and ECH -> self-managed docs have been improved and converted to snippets.
  • Also the Kibana specific steps have been improved to match the reality.

Not updated (out of the scope of this PR)

  • The steps for the self-managed docs haven't been improved because we will be rewriting them soon in a different PR.
  • For all other remote clusters use cases, the Kibana UI fixes will come in another PR. This one contains only the changes related with the IPv6 support. I already have a second snippet ready to be used by 6 other docs.

Closes #3093

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 7, 2025

@eedugon eedugon marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2025 07:12
@eedugon eedugon requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2025 07:12
@eedugon
Copy link
Contributor Author

eedugon commented Oct 7, 2025

Added extra fixes, as the "Elasticsearch API method" of both ECE -> self-managed and ECH -> self-managed docs were incorrect!
I've merged both to a snippet and fixed the incorrect statements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

couple of comments for you. I think the applies tag needs to be removed from the api instructions

@eedugon eedugon requested a review from shainaraskas October 8, 2025 06:38
Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this works. Few minor non blocking suggestions.
Thanks Edu for handling the Kibana part :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@shainaraskas shainaraskas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree with florent's comments. otherwise good to go

@eedugon
Copy link
Contributor Author

eedugon commented Oct 15, 2025

I'm sorry I've been fully occupied the last few days by another PR :( I'll try to get to this tomorrow.
@shainaraskas if you want to take over feel free to go ahead and commit + merge whatever you consider :)

eedugon and others added 6 commits October 16, 2025 08:18
Co-authored-by: shainaraskas <58563081+shainaraskas@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: florent-leborgne <florent.leborgne@elastic.co>
Resolved conflicts in remote cluster documentation files:
- ec-remote-cluster-self-managed.md
- ece-remote-cluster-self-managed.md
- remote-clusters-api-key.md
- remote-clusters-cert.md

Kept IPv6 support functionality from feature branch in all conflicts.
@eedugon eedugon enabled auto-merge (squash) October 16, 2025 06:53
@eedugon eedugon merged commit 83edf08 into main Oct 16, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@eedugon eedugon deleted the rcs_ipv6_support_9.2 branch October 16, 2025 06:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Kibana] IPv6 support for remote clusters

3 participants