Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use fallback synthetic source for copy_to and doc_values: false cases #112294
Use fallback synthetic source for copy_to and doc_values: false cases #112294
Changes from all commits
19c044d
bda4de6
30aefb3
2950b2e
305818a
cdbe5c1
936a2dc
489f030
bf2ccb8
352e9c7
24de7b3
23c0890
ff4342a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if here we add
store: true
...are we going to store the value twice?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes but it is not necessarily the same value (e.g. normalizers).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we also test with an array of values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add them in a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can consider naming the two synthetic source modes
WithDocValues
andWithStoredFields
instead ofNative
andFallback
? Like:SyntheticSourceSupport.WithDocValues
SyntheticSourceSupport.WithStoredFields
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's not really the distinction i am trying to make. Yes,
_ignored_source
is a stored field that holds the value used for synthetic source but it is also possible that the field itself uses a different stored field for synthetic source. That becomes pretty blurry.The difference between
Native
andFallback
is who controls synthetic source logic. InNative
it's the mapper, inFallback
it's on a layer above and the mapper does not control what happens.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as before...if we add
store: true
do we store twice?