Prevent closing index during snapshot restore #16933
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ywelsch
added
>bug
:Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void waitForBlockOnAnyDataNode(String repository, TimeValue timeout) throws InterruptedException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good idea. I have switched to awaitBusy here.
|
Left a minor comment. Otherwise, LGTM. |
ywelsch
force-pushed
the
fix/snaprestore-fails-close
branch
from
edac4c5 to
71ac12f
Compare
ywelsch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2016
Prevent closing index during snapshot restore
ywelsch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closing an index that is being restored from a snapshot should fail the close operation. The previous behavior would close the index and the snapshot process would continue running indefinitely.
Relates to #16321