-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add doc values support for JSON fields. #40069
Merged
jtibshirani
merged 17 commits into
elastic:object-fields
from
jtibshirani:json-doc-values
Apr 1, 2019
Merged
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1719b02
Create doc values fields for JSON fields.
jtibshirani d634d3b
Support filtered doc values for keyed JSON fields.
jtibshirani ef3851c
Add an eager_global_ordinals setting.
jtibshirani 94d4425
Add checks around caching to IndexFieldDataServiceTests.
jtibshirani 4f9598e
Add javadoc.
jtibshirani 5124a6f
Make sure to delegate getChildResources.
jtibshirani 08cc504
Make sure we always filter non-matching prefixes when sorting.
jtibshirani 7dd443a
Calculate the first and last ordinals for a prefix through binary sea…
jtibshirani 3097ed1
Update the reference documentation.
jtibshirani 7058eeb
Refactor to return DocValues.emptySortedSet() when no terms match.
jtibshirani 19e7d2a
Use an unsigned shift in the binary search methods.
jtibshirani f482d3e
Fix a typo in the docs.
jtibshirani e0a5505
Use UncheckedIOException.
jtibshirani a390337
Cache the first ordinal in a document.
jtibshirani 54ac640
Error when an out-of-bounds ordinal is passed to lookupOrd.
jtibshirani be00cf4
Fix FieldSortIT#testJsonField.
jtibshirani c0c1a9b
Break out of advanceExact when ord > maxOrd.
jtibshirani File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not related to this pr but
KeyedJsonFieldType#existsQuery
should also use the_field_names
field instead of a prefix query ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I will give this some thought and follow up in a separate issue/ PR.