Cleanup test user in HLRC test #49477
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: elastic#48440
tvernum
added
>test
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/Java High Level REST Client) |
jkakavas
pushed a commit
to jkakavas/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: elastic#48440
jkakavas
pushed a commit
to jkakavas/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: elastic#48440
jkakavas
pushed a commit
to jkakavas/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: elastic#48440
jkakavas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: #48440 Co-authored-by: Tim Vernum <tim@adjective.org>
jkakavas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: #48440 Co-authored-by: Tim Vernum <tim@adjective.org>
jkakavas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the cluster in an unexpected state for other tests. This commit: - Deletes the user at the end of `testGetUser` - Adds the test-name as metadata to the users that are created in `SecurityIT` so that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests - Enables SecurityDocumentationIT.testGetUsers on the expectation that the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test. Relates: #48440 Co-authored-by: Tim Vernum <tim@adjective.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SecurityIT.testGetUser creates a user for testing purposes, but did
not delete the user at the end of the test. This could leave the
cluster in an unexpected state for other tests.
This commit:
testGetUserSecurityITso that their origin is clear if they do interfere with other tests
the new cleanup step will resolve the unreliability of that test.
Relates: #48440