Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flush instead of synced-flush inactive shards #51365

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2020

Conversation

dnhatn
Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn commented Jan 23, 2020

If all nodes are on 7.6, we prefer to perform a normal flush instead of synced flush when a shard becomes inactive.

Backport of #49126

@dnhatn dnhatn requested a review from ywelsch January 23, 2020 17:57
@dnhatn dnhatn mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2020
7 tasks
@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented Jan 23, 2020

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/1

Copy link
Contributor

@ywelsch ywelsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented Jan 23, 2020

org.elasticsearch.xpack.core.ilm.WaitForSnapshotStepTests.testHashcodeAndEquals

Opened #51377.

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/2

@dnhatn dnhatn merged commit 1ca5dd1 into elastic:7.x Jan 23, 2020
@dnhatn dnhatn deleted the flush-inactive-7x branch January 23, 2020 22:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants