Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[APM] Improve loading states for Local UI Filters #43339

Closed
dgieselaar opened this issue Aug 15, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #44063
Closed

[APM] Improve loading states for Local UI Filters #43339

dgieselaar opened this issue Aug 15, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #44063
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support

Comments

@dgieselaar
Copy link
Member

dgieselaar commented Aug 15, 2019

When we're loading the local UI filter aggregations, we're not displaying any filters until the aggregations come in, and that might take a while:

Screen Recording 2019-08-16 at 14 39 43

However, we know which filters should be shown as they are configured in the UI, and we could display them immediately, and it would be less jarring to the user.

@dgieselaar dgieselaar added the Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support label Aug 15, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/apm-ui

@sorenlouv sorenlouv added [zube]: Impl Backlog enhancement New value added to drive a business result labels Aug 21, 2019
@sorenlouv sorenlouv changed the title [APM] Improve loading/empty states for Local UI Filters [APM] Improve loading states for Local UI Filters Aug 22, 2019
dgieselaar added a commit to dgieselaar/kibana that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2019
dgieselaar added a commit to dgieselaar/kibana that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants