Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Estimate bucket span not working when search.max_buckets set in dynamic cluster settings #59625

Closed
sw-jung opened this issue Mar 9, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #59639
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Anomaly Detection ML anomaly detection :ml v7.7.0

Comments

@sw-jung
Copy link
Contributor

sw-jung commented Mar 9, 2020

Kibana version: 7.4.x, 7.5.1

Elasticsearch version: 7.4.x, 7.5.1

Server OS version: Cloud

Browser version: Chromium 80

Browser OS version: Windows 10

Original install method (e.g. download page, yum, from source, etc.): Cloud

Describe the bug: Estimate bucket span not working when search.max_buckets set in dynamic cluster settings with message Unable to retrieve cluster setting search.max_buckets.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Set search.max_buckets in dynamic cluster settings like below:
PUT _cluster/settings
{
  "transient": {
    "search.max_buckets": 20000
  }
}
  1. Go to ML page
  2. Create a random new single metric job.
  3. Click the estimate bucket span button.

Expected behavior: Estimate bucket span button should be working even if search.max_buckets set in cluster settings.

Screenshots (if relevant):
image

@sw-jung sw-jung added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience :ml labels Mar 9, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/ml-ui (:ml)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Anomaly Detection ML anomaly detection :ml v7.7.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants