Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: X-Pack Jest Tests.x-pack/plugins/rollup/public/test/client_integration - Create Rollup Job, step 6: Review save() with starting job after creation should call the "create" and "start" Api server endpoints #69783

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #121144
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Feature:Rollups Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Jun 24, 2020

A test failed on a tracked branch

Error: thrown: "Exceeded timeout of 5000ms for a test.
Use jest.setTimeout(newTimeout) to increase the timeout value, if this is a long-running test."
    at describe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/x-pack/plugins/rollup/public/test/client_integration/job_create_review.test.js:160:7)
    at _dispatchDescribe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/index.js:67:26)
    at describe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/index.js:30:5)
    at describe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/x-pack/plugins/rollup/public/test/client_integration/job_create_review.test.js:159:5)
    at _dispatchDescribe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/index.js:67:26)
    at describe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/index.js:30:5)
    at Object.<anonymous>.describe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/x-pack/plugins/rollup/public/test/client_integration/job_create_review.test.js:134:3)
    at _dispatchDescribe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/index.js:67:26)
    at describe (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/index.js:30:5)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/x-pack/plugins/rollup/public/test/client_integration/job_create_review.test.js:25:1)
    at Runtime._execModule (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:1205:24)
    at Runtime._loadModule (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:805:12)
    at Runtime.requireModule (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-runtime/build/index.js:662:10)
    at jestAdapter (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:145:13)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)

First failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Jun 24, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-test-triage (failed-test)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@tylersmalley tylersmalley added the Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more label Jul 7, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/es-ui (Team:Elasticsearch UI)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

spalger added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
spalger added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 3d08276)
spalger added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 3d08276)
@spalger
Copy link
Contributor

spalger commented Jul 30, 2020

7 failures in the last month isn't a ton, but combined with #70043 the number of failures jumps to 18. Both of these tests use timers to produce "stability" which I think is a misuse of timers and should be addressed

image

Skipped

master: 3d08276
7.x/7.10: 0629266

(I originally skipped in 7.9 too, but there haven't been any failures in 7.9 and release is looming so I've reverted that skip)

spalger added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
gmmorris added a commit to gmmorris/kibana that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2020
* master:
  [Vega][Inspector] Request panel should show correct names for requests (elastic#73655)
  [Security Solution] Update filter (elastic#73350)
  TSVB Inaccurate Group By (elastic#73683)
  [Vega][Inspect panel] Write tutorials and reference (elastic#73262)
  [ML] Removing node info check for file data viz import (elastic#73717)
  check that pathname has been updated. ignore other parts (elastic#73689)
  [build] rewrite source as transpiled JS later in the process (elastic#73749)
  Fix Snapshot Restore /policies/indices API endpoint on Cloud (elastic#73734)
  skip flaky suite (elastic#69783) (elastic#70043)
  [Security Solution][Exceptions] - Updates exception hooks and viewer (elastic#73588)
  skip failing suite (elastic#58815)
  [Canvas][fatal bug] Fix props confusion in TextStylePicker (elastic#73732)
  [DOCS] Changes level offset of monitoring pages (elastic#73573)
  Added close button to toast notifications by migrating to different API that is more widely used in Kibana and Security solution in particular. (elastic#73662)
  [ML] Transforms/DFA: Change action button size back to 'xs'.
  [Metrics UI] Fix evaluating rate-aggregated alerts when there's no normalized value (elastic#73545)
  [Metrics UI] Fix formatting of values in inventory context.reason (elastic#73155)
  [maps] rename GisMap to MapContainer and convert to TS (elastic#73690)
  [APM] docs: remove watcher documentation  (elastic#73485)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Feature:Rollups Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants