Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security Solution][Platform] - Add connectors to import/export API #148703

Merged

Conversation

WafaaNasr
Copy link
Contributor

@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr commented Jan 11, 2023

Summary

  • Addresses [Security Solution][Platform] - Add connectors to import/export API #118774
  • Enable Security Rule to be imported even if one of its connectors has a missing secret
  • Shows Warning Callout in the Import Modal when missing secrets connector is imported.
  • Added Link connectors to the connectors page in the same tab, so that the user can fix imported connectors.
  • Added Overwrite existing connectors with conflicting action "id" option to the Import Modal

Cases:

Export:
- Export Rule(s) with connectors through Export All or Bulk Actions

Import:
- Import Rule with correct connectors data
- Import Rule with missing secrets' connectors by showing a warning callout
- Re-Import connectors even if they were stored when overwrite is true

Error:
- Showing an error message when the user has a Read Actions permission and stops the importing => You may not have actions privileges required to import rules with actions ...
- Showing an error message when the user has an old imported rule missing all the connectors data OR these connectors were not in the user's env => X connector is missing. Connector id missing is: X
- Showing an error if the new connectors defined in the exported file are not corresponding to the actions array under the rules param => X connector is missing. Connector id missing is: X
- Showing a conflict error in case of existing connectors and re-importing again with an overwrite false => this won't happen in case of implementing the Skipping action-connectors importing if all connectors have been imported/created before

Skip importing:
- Skipping action-connectors importing if the actions array is empty, even if the user has exported-connectors in the file
- Skipping action-connectors importing if all connectors have been imported/created before

Screenshots

1. Importing Connectors successfully
image

2. Importing Connectors with warnings

image

3.Connector Page

image

New text: @nastasha-solomon

1. Warning message

title => could be 1 connector imported or x connectors imported
message => 1 connector has sensitive information that requires updates. review in connectors or x connectors have sensitive information that requires updates. review in connectors

image

2. New Overwrite checkbox
image

3. Success Toast message

image

4. Error messages
a. Missing import action privileges
image

image

b. Missing connectors
image
image

@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr added WIP Work in progress Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. release_note:feature Makes this part of the condensed release notes Team:Security Solution Platform Security Solution Platform Team 8.7 candidate labels Jan 11, 2023
@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr self-assigned this Jan 11, 2023
@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr requested a review from a team as a code owner January 11, 2023 08:47
@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr requested a review from spong January 11, 2023 08:47
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

@kibanamachine kibanamachine requested a review from a team as a code owner January 11, 2023 08:52
@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr added the ci:cloud-deploy Create or update a Cloud deployment label Jan 11, 2023
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from kibana-ci Jan 11, 2023
@elastic elastic deleted a comment from kibana-ci Jan 11, 2023
@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2023 10:10
@WafaaNasr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

merge conflict between base and head

@elastic elastic deleted a comment from kibana-ci Jan 17, 2023
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ import { importRulesRoute } from './route';

jest.mock('../../../../../machine_learning/authz');

// TODO add tests for connectors
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you planning to add them for this PR, or a follow up? 👍 if you'd like to follow-up with an additional test-coverage PR -- would be nice to add a few more FTR tests covering connectors as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did already in this file x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/group10/import_rules.ts which I found exactly the same as this file x-pack/plugins/security_solution/server/lib/detection_engine/rule_management/api/rules/import_rules/route.test.ts and the interesting thing is this file is not referenced at all, that's why I didn't add tests there and I wanted to ask if we need this file actually?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So this file contains the jest unit tests against the route, whereas .../detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/group10/import_rules.ts are the FTR (functional test runner) API integration tests that actually stand up a kibana/es instance to test the import e2e.

This file would be good for testing the basic route inputs and such (or any other conditional logic specific to the route itself), but the latter is best for testing the complete flow from request to response, so good to have both. For these unit tests, the only connector specific test you might want to add is around the new overwrite_action_connectors query param that was added to the importQuerySchema, but as you mention, this could be covered by the FTR tests as well.

Copy link
Member

@spong spong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked out, tested locally, and did a high-level code review and LGTM! 👍 🚀 🙂

Overall looks great @WafaaNasr -- thank you for all your efforts here and getting our users closer to a one-click backup/recover workflow! 🙌 🙂

@WafaaNasr
Copy link
Contributor Author

WafaaNasr commented Feb 2, 2023

Checked out, tested locally, and did a high-level code review and LGTM! 👍 🚀 🙂

Overall looks great @WafaaNasr -- thank you for all your efforts here and getting our users closer to a one-click backup/recover workflow! 🙌 🙂

Thank you so much @spong for your very thorough review!! really appreciated 🙏🏻😊
I will address all the comments thanks!

@nastasha-solomon
Copy link
Contributor

@ARWNightingale do you have any objections to changing the last part of this warning message from review in connectors to Go to connectors.?

connector-warning-message

This change would align the message with the one that displays when users perform a similar act on the Saved Objects page, which is importing a connector that needs configuration details re-applied or fixed. I think the consistent messaging can encourage the same behavior (i.e., go to the Connectors page to fix your connectors) and create a seamless experience for users whether they're receiving the warning from the Import rules modal or the Saved Objects page.

so-import-connector

cc: @WafaaNasr

@WafaaNasr
Copy link
Contributor Author

WafaaNasr commented Feb 2, 2023

Thanks for pulling the copy together for review, @WafaaNasr! I've left some suggestions and questions below for your consideration. Hopefully they're helpful!

1. Warning message

  • Title: Would it be possible to change the title so it's more descriptive of the action that we want users to take. Instead of x connector imported can it be x connectors need your attention or x connectors are missing information?

  • Message: The phrase "sensitive information" is accurate but sounds a little scary. What do you think about changing it to describe what needs to be re-entered or re-applied? How about something like x connectors must be re-authenticated or are missing configuration details. Fix them here. (here would be linked to the Connectors page) => Will leave the message as it is to be consistent with the Saved Object page under Stack Management

    2. New Overwrite checkbox I recommend removing action before connectors since we generally refer to connectors without it. Here's what I'm suggesting: Overwrite existing connectors with conflicting action "id" => DONE please validate in the new cloud build

3. Success Toast message LGTM!

4. Error messages

  • Missing import action privileges: Will users see this error message in any other situations or does it only appear if they for sure don't have the necessary feature privileges? If this only appears because they're missing feature privs, I recommend changing the message to something like You need additional privileges to import rules with actions. Refer to [the documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/security/master/detections-permissions-section.html#enable-detections-ui) for more information.

    => DONE please validate in the new cloud build, as agreed the new message is You need additional privileges to import rules with actions. only

    • Missing connectors: Can you provide a little background on the purpose of this error message and what it describes? Why would a connector be missing? What should users do when they encounter this error? => ** Covered on our meeting :) **

@nastasha-solomon thanks for the comments, please find the updated state per each item :)

@nkhristinin
Copy link
Contributor

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@WafaaNasr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ARWNightingale do you have any objections to changing the last part of this warning message from review in connectors to Go to connectors.?

connector-warning-message

This change would align the message with the one that displays when users perform a similar act on the Saved Objects page, which is importing a connector that needs configuration details re-applied or fixed. I think the consistent messaging can encourage the same behavior (i.e., go to the Connectors page to fix your connectors) and create a seamless experience for users whether they're receiving the warning from the Import rules modal or the Saved Objects page.

so-import-connector

cc: @WafaaNasr

@nastasha-solomon I confirmed with @ARWNightingale that we are going to implement the same UI as in the Saved Object page, I will add the Go to connectors button instead of review in connectors`

@WafaaNasr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@XavierM XavierM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Response Ops side looks good

@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

kibana-ci commented Feb 6, 2023

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

Module Count

Fewer modules leads to a faster build time

id before after diff
securitySolution 3584 3585 +1

Async chunks

Total size of all lazy-loaded chunks that will be downloaded as the user navigates the app

id before after diff
infra 1.3MB 1.3MB +31.0B
lists 152.1KB 152.1KB +30.0B
securitySolution 12.9MB 12.9MB +13.5KB
total +13.6KB

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @WafaaNasr

Copy link
Contributor

@nkhristinin nkhristinin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested locally, LGTM!
Great work!

@@ -589,6 +633,18 @@ export default ({ getService }: FtrProviderContext): void => {
exceptions_errors: [],
exceptions_success: true,
exceptions_success_count: 0,
action_connectors_success: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we have here action_connectors_success but also action_connectors_errors

Copy link
Contributor Author

@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr Feb 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good question, actually, this test is not needed as per this discussion initially I added the default values of the exported connectors, just to mimic the exported file if no actions' connectors were exported.

@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr merged commit 8733774 into elastic:main Feb 6, 2023
@WafaaNasr WafaaNasr deleted the 118774-import-export-connectors-with-rules branch February 6, 2023 16:47
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added v8.7.0 backport:skip This commit does not require backporting labels Feb 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
8.7 candidate backport:skip This commit does not require backporting ci:cloud-deploy Create or update a Cloud deployment needs_docs release_note:feature Makes this part of the condensed release notes Team:Security Solution Platform Security Solution Platform Team ui-copy Review of UI copy with docs team is recommended v8.7.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.