Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Alerting] System action types and helpers #167871
[Alerting] System action types and helpers #167871
Changes from all commits
6ec30eb
40306ce
0fab8a8
5024714
3bda9b9
54fd67a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why we did not create here two types(system and default) instead of one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because this type represents what is being saved in ES. The data in ES should not have the action's
type
so there is not need to distinguish (I don't think it is possible without the type) the two actions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cnasikas Why in one case you use
DistributiveOmit
and in anotherOmit
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason is that the
RuleAction
is the unionRuleDefaultAction | RuleSystemAction
. NormalOmit
does not work with unions. If you need to remove a property from each item in the union you need to useDistributiveOmit
. ForRuleSystemAction
is not needed because it is not a union.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I named it
isSystemAction
and notisSystemActionConnector
because the checks in the alerting plugin will be done upon rule actions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we use
actions.isSystemActionConnector
(exposed by the rule factory asisSystemAction
) instead of using that helper function that checks only thetype
?