Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

increase type check memory for x-pack to 4GB #49255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2019

Conversation

spalger
Copy link
Contributor

@spalger spalger commented Oct 24, 2019

I noticed OOMs when type checking the x-pack project in #48026, and increased the memory for the x-pack project there but it's now happening outside of that PR too, and with some consistency.

This is probably the last reasonable memory increase we should allow, and instead we really need to escalate efforts to break x-pack up into separate projects. Typed, built, etc. separately.

@spalger spalger added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v8.0.0 release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.5.0 v7.6.0 labels Oct 24, 2019
@spalger spalger requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2019 21:27
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

Copy link
Contributor

@brianseeders brianseeders left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

the instances that run intake have 16GB memory, so should be okay

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@spalger
Copy link
Contributor Author

spalger commented Oct 25, 2019

7.x/7.6: bbb29c6
7.5: c39beb5

@spalger spalger deleted the increase-x-pack-type-check-memory branch October 25, 2019 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v7.5.0 v7.6.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants