Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Troubleshooting update #16721

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Docs: Troubleshooting update #16721

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mmahacek
Copy link

@mmahacek mmahacek commented Nov 25, 2024

PREVIEW: https://logstash_bk_16721.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/guide/en/logstash/master/ts-logstash.html

Release notes

[rn:skip]

What does this PR do?

Adds troubleshooting item for when cgroup v2 is not enabled

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Document an issue that has been encountered by mulitple users.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Author's Checklist

  • n/a

How to test this PR locally

Docs-only

Related issues

n/a

Use cases

n/a

Screenshots

n/a

Logs

n/a

@mmahacek
Copy link
Author

Addresses #15124

Copy link
Contributor

📃 DOCS PREVIEWhttps://logstash_bk_16721.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/diff

Co-authored-by: João Duarte <jsvd@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

📃 DOCS PREVIEWhttps://logstash_bk_16721.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/diff

@jsvd jsvd requested a review from karenzone November 26, 2024 15:46
Copy link
Member

@jsvd jsvd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this contribution. the content LGTM, pinging @karenzone for second review as I think it benefits from a structure and formatting check.

Copy link
Contributor

@karenzone karenzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left comments inline for consideration. Please let me know what you think.

@@ -106,6 +106,76 @@ This issue affects some OpenJDK-derived JVM versions (Adoptium, OpenJDK, and Azu
-Djdk.io.File.enableADS=true
-----

[[ts-container-cgroup]]
===== Container exits with 'An unexpected error occurred!'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
===== Container exits with 'An unexpected error occurred!'
===== Container exits with 'An unexpected error occurred!' message

[[ts-container-cgroup]]
===== Container exits with 'An unexpected error occurred!'

Logstash may not start when running on a container due to a bug in the JDK https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343191. A Pull Request was created to fix the issue: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21808.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Logstash may not start when running on a container due to a bug in the JDK https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343191. A Pull Request was created to fix the issue: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21808.
{ls} running in a container may not start due to a https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343191[bug in the JDK].

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can future proof the doc by removing the link to the in process PR. The issue you link to contains status info.
Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 4 08 22 PM

Please LMKWYT.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants