Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flag to enable profiling with HTTP pprof #709

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 13, 2021

Conversation

jsoriano
Copy link
Member

Add flag to enable profiling with HTTP pprof.

@jsoriano jsoriano requested a review from mtojek August 12, 2021 16:51
@jsoriano jsoriano self-assigned this Aug 12, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Aug 12, 2021

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2021-08-13T07:56:00.034+0000

  • Duration: 5 min 12 sec

  • Commit: 124870e

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 92
Skipped 0
Total 92

Trends 🧪

Image of Build Times

Image of Tests

@ruflin
Copy link
Member

ruflin commented Aug 13, 2021

Should we enable it by default but only expose it on localhost? This has the advantage that also in prod you can exec into the container and check potential issues.

@jsoriano
Copy link
Member Author

Should we enable it by default but only expose it on localhost? This has the advantage that also in prod you can exec into the container and check potential issues.

@ruflin I don't have a strong opinion, in general pprof uses to be optional in Go applications that support it, but I don't see a special problem on starting it by default, apart or opening an additional port, even if it is only locally. An alternative could be to don't enable it by default, but add the flag in the Docker images, where opening additional ports is surely not going to cause conflicts.

I have added it as default, as well as some docs. Error starting the server for http prof is handled now, so it explicitly fails if it cannot be opened, I think this is important to avoid cases where one ends-up profiling the wrong process :)

Let me know what you think.

@jsoriano jsoriano requested a review from ruflin August 13, 2021 08:01
Copy link
Contributor

@mtojek mtojek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's safe unless we expose it on public port, which I see it isn't the case here.

@jsoriano jsoriano merged commit 801726e into elastic:master Aug 13, 2021
@jsoriano jsoriano deleted the httpprof branch August 13, 2021 08:26
@ruflin
Copy link
Member

ruflin commented Aug 13, 2021

Already merged but will still comment. If run outside the docker container, it might cause some conflicts with other go httpprof (agent?) on the same port. An alternative would have been to only enabled it by default if run inside the container (container passes the flag) but if run directly as binary it is not exposed by default. But that might also be surprising to have 2 different behaviours. One more option is just to enable it for us for the prod environments that are running.

@jsoriano
Copy link
Member Author

Already merged but will still comment. If run outside the docker container, it might cause some conflicts with other go httpprof (agent?) on the same port. An alternative would have been to only enabled it by default if run inside the container (container passes the flag) but if run directly as binary it is not exposed by default. But that might also be surprising to have 2 different behaviours. One more option is just to enable it for us for the prod environments that are running.

Yes, these were exactly my original thoughts when I didn't enable it by default 🙂 I agree that enabling it only when used is cleaner, I will open a PR to go back to this, and will take this into account for the production deployment.

@jsoriano
Copy link
Member Author

jsoriano commented Aug 13, 2021

Disabling by default in #710

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants