-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Import Jameson Quinn's VSE Sim fork #39
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Added low information strategies and Minimax
Wrote some of threeRoundResults, added a basic but non-rigorous pollsToProbs function, refactored low-information strats, and added a better zero-information approval voting strategy.
Switched to using threeRoundResult. Removed @rememberBallot decorators. Switched from static methods to class methods for strategy functions and results.
Bug fix
Implemented the binary search for determining the minimum foreground to elect the winner under strategy and ensured that all results are returned.
Added comp and diehard strategies for plurality, approval, score, and IRV. (Not yet added for STAR or Condorcet.)
Added diehard and compromise strategies for STAR and Condorcet. Improved the low info strategies for top2 methods. Increased the default polling uncertainty.
It's slow.
created tieFor2Estimate
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Sourcery Code Quality Report❌ Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 9.94%.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Legend and ExplanationThe emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request. Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! Help us improve this quality report! |
@ragconsumer Can you resolve the conflicts so we can merge it? |
Full disclosure: I have no experience handling pull requests of any appreciable size, and I don't see any options for debugging that would prevent the disaster I anticipate when all the code is combined. The old VSE code was absolutely hideous, and I foresee problems when incorporating anything that was based on it. My approach would be to dump the old code altogether and switch to using only the code on Jameson's branch. I can try resolving the conflicts manually if you want, but I expect something to break. By the way, I'm coding a new version in Julia that should make this obsolete in a few months. |
Honestly whatever you want to do with it sounds good to me. Happy to update the website however you see fit. You're the experts. |
No description provided.