Add concurrency to GitHub workflows to auto-cancel older runs. #5101
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
📱 Scan the QR code below to install the build for this PR. If you can't scan the QR code you can install the build via this link: https://i.diawi.com/dMGRi3 |
SBiOSoftWhare
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2021
Yes on develop it will be safer to check each PR |
Updated using this technique: https://stackoverflow.com/a/68422069 |
SBiOSoftWhare
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2021
This was referenced Nov 8, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This limits GitHub actions to only allow each workflow to have a single concurrent run per branch. The result is that pushing new changes to a PR will automatically cancel older runs, freeing up more CI instances for us to use.
Caveat: The same effect will happen on
developtoo, so if 2 PRs are merged within a short time of each other, only the newer one would have CI results. I'm not sure if this is desirable behaviour or not?