Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stage-1 rebrand vector->riot #3798

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

stage-1 rebrand vector->riot #3798

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

t3chguy
Copy link
Member

@t3chguy t3chguy commented May 3, 2017

for #3613

Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski 7t3chguy@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
@dbkr
Copy link
Member

dbkr commented May 4, 2017

Personally, I'm very much in favour of the internal codename remaining as vector: I don't see any value in renaming non-user facing internals to match the brand: it will be another way to introduce bugs.

Edit: having read the bug, it's talking about renaming the release tarball which is a thing we probably should do.

@t3chguy
Copy link
Member Author

t3chguy commented May 4, 2017

@dbkr thats fair enough, I'm of a similar mindset, @lampholder seems of different opinion

@ara4n
Copy link
Member

ara4n commented May 4, 2017

yes, please let's not waste time doing s/Vector/Riot/ on all the classes and variable names. (Just as most of macOS's internal API prefixes are still NS for NextStep... :D). Agreed that user-facing tarballs etc should be named correctly though.

@t3chguy
Copy link
Member Author

t3chguy commented May 5, 2017

@t3chguy t3chguy requested review from ara4n and removed request for ara4n May 5, 2017 18:56
@lampholder
Copy link
Member

@dbkr thats fair enough, I'm of a similar mindset, @lampholder seems of different opinion

Er, do I?

@t3chguy
Copy link
Member Author

t3chguy commented May 11, 2017

@lampholder I misread #3613 (comment)
neeeever mind

@t3chguy
Copy link
Member Author

t3chguy commented May 11, 2017

closed in favour of #3894

@t3chguy t3chguy closed this May 11, 2017
@resynth1943 resynth1943 mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants