Jan 20, 2025 ‐ 16:00 UTC

Host:

• Philipp Ahmann

Participants:

• Rinat Shagisultanov
• Sebastian Hetze
• Nicole Pappler
• Daniel Weingaertner
• Troy Sabin
• Gabriele Paoloni (2nd half)

Regrets:

• ...

Attended Recently

• Walt Miner
• Steven Carbno
• Karen Bennet
• Roberto Paccapeli
• Alfred Strauch
• Kate Stewart
• Thomas Mittelstädt
• Stewart Hildebrand
• Olivier Charrier

Topics & Notes:

Check past action items

• Previous meeting notes: https://github.com/elisa-tech/wg-systems/wiki/Nov-25,-2024-%E2%80%90-16:00-UTC
• AI-Sebastian: Involvement of DIN can also be interesting. Sebastian will take a first contact.
  • Communication started. Another meeting scheduled in Feb.
• AI-Philipp: Invite the epam people to tell a bit about their work and planned activities.
  • No feedback from epam so far. Need to follow up.
• AI-Philipp: Reach out to Thomas M. and Andreas B. for enabling Pi5 with Xen and Zephyr
• AI-Philipp: Response to new Railway WG idea from Sebastian.
  • Mail dropped waiting for response.

Elisa documentation directory (info)

• https://github.com/elisa-tech/directory
• As webpage: https://directory.elisa.tech/
• Will be accessible via the elisa.tech Resource section soon.

Good Quality Practices in Open Source [cont.]

• Worked on gdoc draft to work for the LFE requests: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Uzp4-mAAOd9uMhyKx5Vaa0C8Mq5w1IxhHFAgyE0I9p0
• main thing to do in Project Phases: Effort estimation and a bit clearer work package description.
  • Outcome: Base for financing and show who to involve for execution.
• See latest updates in the document to come to work breakdown structure.
• Request access to make suggestions in case you do not have access rights.

AoB

• Troy joins first time as a colleague of Rinat
• standards-atlas introduction by Sebastian (⭐ = something completely new today)
  • https://github.com/shetze/standards-atlas
  • relate standards to each other
  • doorstop tooling
  • shows similarities and overlaps of different standards using scores.
  • Just as information, there have been also other projects researched cross domain standards.
  • Size of the bubbles in the diagram is the resonance of the clauses in finding relationships.
  • The more generic the clause is, the less significant it is.
  • Quoting the standards on this level was approved by the standard provider and is also mentioned in the project sources.
  • Still in a research PoC state.
  • Requires more feedback to get actual demand.
  • Use case: safety certification against specific standard. Where does it make it easier to certify in another industry/standard.
  • Tool is useful and is worth a dedicated meeting. Licensing can be an issue in the wider adoption and distribution.
    • Copyright discussions are already ongoing
    • Tooling is locally with local model. This means you need to own the pdfs from the standards.
    • The relationships have no content from the standards.
• Regular meeting on Jan 27th. No meeting Feb 3rd due to FOSDEM travel.