Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accessing a connection's state right after it connected #299

Open
greg-rychlewski opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Accessing a connection's state right after it connected #299

greg-rychlewski opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@greg-rychlewski
Copy link
Member

Background

I implemented data change notifications for the SQLite driver. Given a connection and a pid, whenever an insert/update/delete on the connection is performed, the SQLite NIF will send a message to the pid.

This works well on the driver level but on the Ecto level it's not so straight forward for a couple reasons:

  1. We are accessing a pool and not creating the connections ourselves directly
  2. The SQLite driver stores the handle for the database in the connection's state.

Why # 2 is relevant is because I thought about using :after_connect to hook the connections to the listener. But the only argument passed to it is %DBConnection{}, which doesn't have the database handle. Without access to the state it's not possible to use the SQLite connection.

Proposal/question

Would it make sense to allow users to supply a 2-arity function which receives the connection and the state? If the answer is yes, we also allow {m, f, a} so should that one be deprecated to avoid confusion (i.e. why is state not passed to mfa)?

@josevalim
Copy link
Member

I would like to hold on this one for now because I think that SQLite should not be using db_connection. We have on going discussions about this on their issues tracker. :)

@greg-rychlewski
Copy link
Member Author

Ah I'll take a look at that discussion. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants