define relevant Schema.org terms

[abotzki]

• define relevant schema.org terms

schema definitions relevant to describe our resources
(one or more are applicable at the same time)
https://schema.org/Project -> Offer ->
https://schema.org/WebApplication
or https://schema.org/Service

[bpiereck]

schema definitions relevant to describe our resources
(one or more are applicable at the same time)
https://schema.org/Project -> Offer ->
https://schema.org/WebApplication
or https://schema.org/Service

[olisand]

Or maybe https://schema.org/CreativeWork would fit?

[olisand]

Regarding implementation, maybe use this: http://jekyll.github.io/github-metadata/site.github/ ?

[abotzki]

I thought about a description of the individual resources. For what would you use Creative work? The website as such?

…

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, 16:04 olisand ***@***.***> wrote: Regarding implementation, maybe use this: http://jekyll.github.io/github-metadata/site.github/ ? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#103 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJDCI5ALP3V73MIODBAVQ7TYUS3OHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA65UDM26VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJUGQYTANJQGM> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: <elixir-europe-training/ELIXIR-Training-SPLASH/issues/103/1954410503@ github.com>

[bpiereck]

Should we have a KEy words session??
Keywords ???

Suggested profile Creative work https://schema.org/CreativeWork

About: ??
Abstract: What can you do with TeSS
Contributor: Contributors
Funding: funding
License: Resource licenses
Video:
Image: subtype: logo {img itemprop=”logo”}
Name: title
Url: resourceUrl
Mentions: Citations

[olisand]

For Funding, wasn't it funder that we thought would be a better mapping?

[olisand]

Yes, Alex, CreativeWork has several properties that are needed for the website itself.