Drop elm- from package name

[jvoigtlaender]

As per elm-community/guidelines#27, and in particular this discussion: elm-community/guidelines#27 (comment).

[jvoigtlaender]

@mgold, as the maintainer here, do you want to do this?

[mgold]

I'm worried about breaking dependent packages. When moving the repo, a redirect is set up, but the tags refer to both "versions". Luckily, the library is currently on 1.0.1, so I can delete the 1.0.0 tag and release that under the new name. Sound good?

[jvoigtlaender]

@mgold, this has been discussed in other threads, right? And several packages have already made the equivalent move. Was there any major outage from this? Or is the situation here somehow special/different from the other cases?

[mgold]

I don't think so, just being careful.

[mgold]

I'll go ahead and do this for 0.18.

[eeue56]

0.18 is in alpha.. doing so already means now no updates to elm-lazy-list for 0.17 can happen.

[eeue56]

@mgold doing the change this way has broken all 0.17 builds that rely on elm-lazy-list.

noah@noah-Swanky:~/dev/f$ elm-package install elm-community/elm-lazy-list
To install elm-community/elm-lazy-list I would like to add the following
dependency to elm-package.json:

    "elm-community/elm-lazy-list": "1.3.0 <= v < 2.0.0"

May I add that to elm-package.json for you? [Y/n] y

Some new packages are needed. Here is the upgrade plan.

  Install:
    elm-community/elm-lazy-list 1.3.0
    elm-lang/core 4.0.5
    elm-lang/html 1.1.0
    elm-lang/lazy 1.0.0
    elm-lang/virtual-dom 1.1.1

Do you approve of this plan? [Y/n] y
Starting downloads...

  ● elm-lang/lazy 1.0.0
  ● elm-lang/virtual-dom 1.1.1
  ● elm-lang/html 1.1.0
  ● elm-lang/core 4.0.5
Error: Problem when downloading the elm-community/elm-lazy-list 1.3.0 code.

  ✗ elm-community/elm-lazy-list 1.3.0

[eeue56]

I'm going to fix it.

[eeue56]

I've fixed the problem by making elm-community/elm-lazy-list exist again. Please note that doing this without getting a second pair of eyes means that all our builds started failing.

[jvoigtlaender]

Seems this can be closed.

[mgold]

Oh no! So sorry for the trouble. I expected that an elm-lazy-list redirect would be left behind.