-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MIN
mode via acquisition function
#340
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AVHopp
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. However, since this seems to be based on another branch, I might have missed some stuff. Please ping me once the corresponding branch was merged, I'd like to just quickly recheck then
AdrianSosic
commented
Aug 13, 2024
AdrianSosic
force-pushed
the
refactor/min_targets
branch
from
August 21, 2024 10:54
fcf420d
to
bc48ec4
Compare
AdrianSosic
force-pushed
the
refactor/min_targets
branch
from
August 29, 2024 12:15
bc48ec4
to
d158c45
Compare
@AVHopp wanted to be pinged after reabase |
Scienfitz
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2024
This avoids inverting the computational representation, which gives inverted predictions back to the user calling the surrogate.
AdrianSosic
force-pushed
the
refactor/min_targets
branch
from
August 30, 2024 10:46
d158c45
to
c262ce8
Compare
This was referenced Sep 5, 2024
Merged
AdrianSosic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
This PR fixes a critical bug introduced in #340 that has been present since version `0.10.1` and adds a corresponding test. The bug occurs when using improvement-based Monte Carlo acquisition functions (such as the default `qLogExpectedImprovement`) in with a single numerical target in `MIN` mode. The cause was a missing inversion of the `best_f` reference value.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR changes the behavior of
NumericalTarget
inMIN
mode in that the minimization is lo longer implement by negating the computational representation of the target but placing an objective on the acquisition function.This approach avoids the problem that otherwise the surrogate would be trained on inverted targets, resulting in inverted predictions, which prevents us from exposing the surrogate as-is to the user. Also, it cleanly separates the objective (i.e. "minimization") from the target representation.