Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Nashorn & Node.js repls. #379

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

levand
Copy link
Contributor

@levand levand commented Mar 6, 2015

Code for all three "embedded" REPLs is now in a single namespace.

This required upgrading the Clojure and ClojureScript versions used for
development and testing, which also required upgrading Midje and
lein-midje.

Test updates are included, though I could not get the tests to run
properly in the plugin project - I am not sure how they could run
given the current state of the code. Midje seems to bail early instead
of acknowledging an expected error. Tests in support pass correctly.

Documentation is also included

levand added 2 commits March 6, 2015 13:44
Code for all three "embedded" REPLs is now in a single namespace.

This required upgrading the Clojure and ClojureScript versions used for
development and testing, which also required upgrading Midje and
lein-midje.

Test updates are included, though I could not get the tests to run
properly in the `plugin` project - I am not sure how they *could* run
given the current state of the code. Midje seems to bail early instead
of acknowledging an expected error. Tests in `support` pass correctly.
@crocket
Copy link

crocket commented Oct 5, 2015

I want this to be merged!!

@danielcompton
Copy link
Contributor

@crocket this kind of comment comes across as unhelpful. Everybody working or contributing on cljsbuild (and most open source projects) are doing it as a gift for the community. If you're interested in seeing it merged, then a polite 👍 would probably suffice. Open source burnout is a real thing, and these kinds of comments contribute to it.

@mneise
Copy link
Collaborator

mneise commented Oct 11, 2015

@levand Happy to merge this. I don't mind doing a manual merge to resolve the conflicts, or would you want to resolve the conflicts yourself?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants