-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
Fix JS engines to use NODE_JS_TEST #25074
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2ee8959
Fix JS engines to use NODE_JS_TEST
juj d04c4c9
Update instructions to access qemu node
juj 74fcade
dir
juj 5681b22
Update instructions
juj 455143f
Review
juj 5b8bb5b
Restore ternary
juj 5e2e449
Restore to original form
juj ae6e6a1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into node_js_test
juj File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you move these 2 lines to
test/common.pyafter the assignment toNODE_JS_TEST(then you don't need the embedded if/else here).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's some kind of type analysis checker?
mypystep fails withUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if I did the change something wrong, though after moving the two lines, it seems the effect is as if I didn't have those lines at all, i.e. the run fails like it did before this PR altogether. (http://localhost:8010/api/v2/logs/33118/raw_inline)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see, I still need the ternary, I misunderstood the move was intended to avoid that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, it looks like I do, because in common.py, the check is
but in emsdk case,
config.NODE_JS_TESTis set, it has both. So this check doesn't do anything.So it needs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reverted back to the original form, that helped the mypy type check, that insisted thinking that
config.NODE_JSisOptional[Any]and notList[Str]