-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 948
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace task cancellation in BaseHTTPMiddleware
with http.disconnect
+recv_stream.close
#1715
Merged
Kludex
merged 8 commits into
encode:master
from
jhominal:base-http-middleware-no-cancellation
Sep 24, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9561a47
replace BaseMiddleware cancellation after request send with closing r…
jhominal dd8045c
Add no cover pragma on pytest.fail in tests/middleware/test_base.py
jhominal 9161fb8
make http_disconnect_while_sending test more robust in the face of sc…
jhominal 274bdeb
Fix issue with running middleware context manager
jhominal e43a924
Merge branch 'master' into base-http-middleware-no-cancellation
adriangb 13aae76
Merge branch 'master' into base-http-middleware-no-cancellation
Kludex faae18e
Merge branch 'master' into base-http-middleware-no-cancellation
Kludex b0434ab
Merge branch 'master' into base-http-middleware-no-cancellation
Kludex File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What this is doing is saying "wait for a message from the client but if
response_sent
gets set in the meantime then stop waiting/reading from the client and move on"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the issue that I want to solve here is, if the downstream app is waiting on
receive
, but as the response is sent (likely by the middleware), the downstream app cannotsend
anything meaningfully, so there is no point in letting downstream wait for another message from upstream.We could also choose to rely on upstream
receive
returning ahttp.disconnect
message when the response is sent (which should happen), but when I wrote that bit, I thought that a belt-and-braces approach would be better.However, that approach does mean that every call to
receive
from an app gets an intermediaryanyio.TaskGroup
for eachBaseHTTPMiddleware
in the middleware chain.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In other words, I would be open to modifying that part to remove the
receive
wrapper to avoid that cost if it thought to be too much.