You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3, because the PR includes changes across multiple files, including enums, service classes, and tests. The changes involve both bug fixes and enhancements, requiring a detailed review of the logic and the impact on existing functionality.
🧪 Relevant tests
Yes
🔍 Possible issues
Type Mismatch: The change in return type for encoder() and decoder() methods in Codec.php might cause issues if other parts of the codebase expect the previous Encoder and Decoder types instead of the more specific FuelTankEncoder and FuelTankDecoder.
Hardcoded Value: The use of a hardcoded 'primary' value for MULTI_TOKENS in DispatchCall.php might not be flexible for future changes or different contexts.
🔒 Security concerns
No
Code feedback:
relevant file
src/Enums/DispatchCall.php
suggestion
Consider defining 'primary' as a class constant within DispatchCall or another appropriate class. This approach improves maintainability by centralizing the management of such values, making it easier to update if needed. [important]
Ensure that all parts of the codebase that interact with the encoder() and decoder() methods are updated to handle the new specific return types (FuelTankEncoder and FuelTankDecoder). This might involve updating type hints and handling any new methods or properties exposed by these specific types. [important]
For the test_it_can_dispatch_multi_token method, consider adding assertions to validate the structure and content of the response in addition to the encodedData. This ensures that the response meets the expected format and contains the correct data. [medium]
Ensure that the SetCollectionAttribute mutation is properly registered and handled on the server-side. This includes defining the resolver logic and updating any necessary schema definitions to support the new mutation. [important]
Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation
When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels
The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:
a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools
The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, require_can_be_split_review, and more.
Auto-approve PRs
By invoking:
/review auto_approve
The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.
To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:
[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true
(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)
You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:
[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
Make return types of encoder() and decoder() methods more generic.
Consider making the return type of encoder() and decoder() methods more generic or an interface if FuelTankEncoder and FuelTankDecoder share a common interface or parent class. This would improve the flexibility and maintainability of your code by not tightly coupling it to specific implementations.
-public function encoder(): FuelTankEncoder-public function decoder(): FuelTankDecoder+public function encoder(): EncoderInterface+public function decoder(): DecoderInterface
Ensure consistency in mutation class names.
For consistency and to avoid confusion, ensure that all instances of InsertRuleSetMutation::getEncodableParams and similar method calls use the same mutation class name, especially if there was a typo or inconsistency in naming (InsertRulesetMutation vs InsertRuleSetMutation).
It's recommended to use a data provider for tests that are only varying by parameters such as test_it_can_dispatch_multi_token. This approach reduces code duplication and makes it easier to add more test cases in the future.
-public function test_it_can_dispatch_multi_token(): void+/**+ * @dataProvider dispatchDataProvider+ */+public function test_dispatch_variations($method, $params, $expected): void
Avoid persisting test data to the database in tests.
Ensure that Collection::factory()->create() in generateParams method is wrapped in a transaction or uses a mocking strategy to avoid persisting test data to the database. This practice helps in maintaining a clean test environment and ensures tests do not interfere with each other.
Maintain a logical order of service providers in configuration files.
When adding new service providers to the providers list in testbench.yaml, ensure they are added in a logical order or grouped by functionality. This helps in maintaining a clear structure and understanding of the project's dependencies.
Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions
Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality
While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type
enhancement, bug_fix
Description
DispatchCallenum to assign a proper value toMULTI_TOKENS.DispatchTest.EncodingTest.FuelTanksServiceProviderin the test environment configuration.SetCollectionAttributefor setting collection attributes.Changes walkthrough
DispatchCall.php
Update DispatchCall Enum with Correct Value for MULTI_TOKENSsrc/Enums/DispatchCall.php
MULTI_TOKENSfrom an empty string to 'primary'.Codec.php
Update Codec Service with Specific Encoder and Decoder Typessrc/Services/Processor/Substrate/Codec/Codec.php
encoder()toFuelTankEncoder.decoder()toFuelTankDecoder.SetCollectionAttribute.graphql
Add GraphQL Mutation for Setting Collection Attributestests/Feature/GraphQL/Resources/SetCollectionAttribute.graphql
SetCollectionAttribute.DispatchTest.php
Add Test for Multi-Token Dispatch and Update Parameter Generationtests/Feature/GraphQL/Mutations/DispatchTest.php
test_it_can_dispatch_multi_tokento verify dispatchfunctionality for multi tokens.
generateParamsmethod to supportDispatchCall::MULTI_TOKENS.EncodingTest.php
Fix Typo in EncodingTest Method Callstests/Unit/EncodingTest.php
InsertRulesetMutationtoInsertRuleSetMutation.RemoveRulesetmutationtoRemoveRuleSetMutation.testbench.yaml
Register FuelTanksServiceProvider in Test Environmenttestbench.yaml
FuelTanksServiceProviderto the providers list.