Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support newer rspec-expectations #138

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

pvalena
Copy link

@pvalena pvalena commented Oct 11, 2018

Make spec/childprocess_spec.rb rspec compatible with
rubygem-rspec-expectations-3.7.0-3.fc29.1.noarch

(Tested on Fedora Rawhide.)

Make `spec/childprocess_spec.rb` rspec compatible with 
  rubygem-rspec-expectations-3.7.0-3.fc29.1.noarch

(Tested on Fedora Rawhide.)
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 94.463% when pulling ef48f69 on pvalena:patch-1 into c005912 on enkessler:master.

4 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 94.463% when pulling ef48f69 on pvalena:patch-1 into c005912 on enkessler:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 94.463% when pulling ef48f69 on pvalena:patch-1 into c005912 on enkessler:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 94.463% when pulling ef48f69 on pvalena:patch-1 into c005912 on enkessler:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 94.463% when pulling ef48f69 on pvalena:patch-1 into c005912 on enkessler:master.

@sds sds mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2019
@sds
Copy link
Collaborator

sds commented Jan 10, 2019

Hey @pvalena, thanks for the pull request. Any particular reason you changed the check to be_truthy instead of eq true? This changes the semantics of what you're checking ever so slightly, so want to make sure it's intentional.

Otherwise this looks good to merge. Let us know!

@sds
Copy link
Collaborator

sds commented Jan 12, 2019

FWIW, I'm able to run these tests without issue on rspec-expectations 3.8.0. I'm going to close this as it's not clear to me from the PR description why this is necessary, but would be more than happy to merge once justification is provided. Thanks!

@sds sds closed this Jan 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants